Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix the sample code analyzer to properly handle missing_identifier errors #87593

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Aug 4, 2021

Conversation

gspencergoog
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This fixes how the sample analyzer handles missing_identifier errors. It was looking at the wrong line, and missing an else clause, so it was silently allowing missing_identifier errors to pass.

In addition, this fixes the sample generation so that it uses the correct filename for the output files: it previously was looking for the first line that had a filename, which was meant to indicate a non-generated line. This change adds a new Line.generated constructor for generated lines, so that they can also have the correct filename associated with them.

Related Issues

@flutter-dashboard flutter-dashboard bot added the team Infra upgrades, team productivity, code health, technical debt. See also team: labels. label Aug 3, 2021
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes label Aug 3, 2021
Copy link
Member

@jonahwilliams jonahwilliams left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

RSLGTM

@gspencergoog gspencergoog merged commit 169bb1b into flutter:master Aug 4, 2021
@gspencergoog gspencergoog deleted the fix_analyzer branch August 4, 2021 00:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
team Infra upgrades, team productivity, code health, technical debt. See also team: labels.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

analyze linux is failing on Cirrus only due to snippet analysis issue.
2 participants