Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

specification: add ros2idl to MCAP spec appendix #553

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Sep 8, 2022
Merged

Conversation

james-rms
Copy link
Collaborator

@james-rms james-rms commented Aug 24, 2022

Public-Facing Changes
Adds ros2idl as a well-known schema encoding, as well as a more complete description of the concatenations scheme for .msg definitions.

Description

@james-rms james-rms force-pushed the jrms/rosidl-spec branch 2 times, most recently from f3119e7 to 3058f6b Compare August 24, 2022 05:43
@james-rms james-rms force-pushed the jrms/rosidl-spec branch 2 times, most recently from f8934cd to d81afbe Compare August 24, 2022 06:18
@james-rms james-rms force-pushed the jrms/rosidl-spec branch 4 times, most recently from 528ac42 to 48b4149 Compare September 6, 2022 01:09
Copy link
Contributor

@defunctzombie defunctzombie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 from me. I'd get some more thumbs since this is a schema change and will be with us forever.

Copy link
Contributor

@amacneil amacneil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was going to write a comment that I thought ros2idl diverging from ros2msg and ros1msg (gendeps style) was a mistake.

However, I read the arguments in this PR and thought more about it, and it seems like a good choice that will simplify parsing. And, you can think of it as still being gendeps-compatible, only the first "anonymous message definition" is blank.

In fact, we could change the spec to support making the first anonymous message definition optional (and recommended to be blank) for ros2msg as well as ros2idl, and change the behavior in rosbag2_storage_mcap to explicitly specify the ===\nMSG: header for all schemas.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants