Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to GeoTools 24.0 and JTS 1.17.1 #5007

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 8, 2021

Conversation

jodygarnett
Copy link
Contributor

@jodygarnett jodygarnett commented Sep 11, 2020

  • Testing out the 24-RC ahead of GeoTools release to check for regressions.
  • Updated with the final GeoTools 24.0 release
  • Updated with GeoTools 24.1 release as this PR has not been merged yet

@jodygarnett jodygarnett changed the title Upgrade to GeoTools 24-RC and jts 1.17.1 Upgrade to GeoTools 24.0 and JTS 1.17.1 Sep 21, 2020
@jodygarnett jodygarnett marked this pull request as ready for review September 21, 2020 16:22
@jodygarnett
Copy link
Contributor Author

@josegar74 this may be considered for master and 3.10.x backport.

  • There were no difficulties encountered during this upgrade.

@jodygarnett
Copy link
Contributor Author

jodygarnett commented Sep 21, 2020

aside: I did notice when checking version numbers that geotools using postgis-driver-1.0.jar, and geonetwork using postgis-jdbc-1.3.3.jar - I am personally not sure what the difference is between these two, it has been this way for a while.

@jodygarnett
Copy link
Contributor Author

aside: The PR has been open so long we can probably update to GeoTools 24.1 now ...

@fxprunayre are you in a position to review?

Testing out the RC ahead of release to check for regressions

Signed-off-by: Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@gmail.com>
@juanluisrp juanluisrp merged commit 4f5bf64 into geonetwork:master Jan 8, 2021
@juanluisrp juanluisrp added this to the 3.12.0 milestone Jan 8, 2021
@pvgenuchten
Copy link

Tested:

  • ows harvester (wfs) -> ok
  • extent api -> ok
  • csw request with bounds filter -> ok

@jodygarnett
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for testing @pvgenuchten, are the harvester tests something we could automate and restrict to a profile (to run on demand).

@juanluisrp juanluisrp mentioned this pull request Apr 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants