-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.5k
Move system symbol lookup into a postgres database. #3022
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2c3c279
Initial work on database based system symbols
mitsuhiko 4a770f2
Implement basic system symbol lookup from database
mitsuhiko 92d49a6
Roll back on duplicate failure in import script
mitsuhiko c4b0488
Added fuzzy matching
mitsuhiko bb3a287
Make some import local
mitsuhiko 47cd67c
Bump symsynd to 0.4
mitsuhiko c848a78
Added demangling for system frames and trim symbols
mitsuhiko b22a364
Bump symsynd dependency to 0.5.2
mitsuhiko 78b751e
Match lengths in stacktrace
mitsuhiko 80d392f
Refactored system symbol code and optimized storage in postres
mitsuhiko 7be386a
Bump symsynd to 0.6.1
mitsuhiko 4ee5d73
Added missing platforms to SDK mapping
mitsuhiko 5e3884b
Fix SENTRY-12T
mitsuhiko 027f110
Stop using prepare for symbol filling
mitsuhiko 1b5dd37
Added optimistic bulk insert with normal fallback
mitsuhiko 033aaf1
Lower dsym insert batch for sqlite
mitsuhiko cc45369
Move bulk insert code into the models
mitsuhiko File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ | |
] | ||
|
||
dsym_requires = [ | ||
'symsynd>=0.3.0,<1.0.0', | ||
'symsynd>=0.6.1,<1.0.0', | ||
] | ||
|
||
|
||
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given the current index, anyone any objections to these two queries? Unfortunately they are sent individually for all N frames. I could union them up with a bit of extra work but the only way to really improve this would be a stored procedure i think.