Skip to content

Conversation

atorralba
Copy link
Contributor

The first commit adds a test that fails because implicit reads weren't allowed in sinks or additional taint steps that used FlowStates.

The second commit fixes the issue.

MathiasVP
MathiasVP previously approved these changes Sep 8, 2022
@atorralba atorralba changed the title Java: Fix implicit reads in taint tracking when FlowStates are used Dataflow: Fix implicit reads in taint tracking when FlowStates are used Sep 8, 2022
@atorralba atorralba force-pushed the atorralba/fix-taint-implicit-reads branch from 6f9b856 to 1078cf0 Compare September 9, 2022 08:28
@atorralba atorralba removed the JS label Sep 9, 2022
@atorralba atorralba removed the request for review from a team September 9, 2022 08:29
@atorralba atorralba merged commit 569fad6 into github:main Sep 9, 2022
@atorralba atorralba deleted the atorralba/fix-taint-implicit-reads branch September 9, 2022 12:28
owen-mc added a commit to owen-mc/codeql that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2022
owen-mc added a commit to owen-mc/codeql that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2022
owen-mc added a commit to owen-mc/codeql that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2022
owen-mc added a commit to owen-mc/codeql that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants