LGTM deprecation: a few more references missed in earlier PRs #11503
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
felicitymay
commented
Nov 30, 2022
docs/codeql/codeql-language-guides/using-type-tracking-for-api-modeling.rst
Show resolved
Hide resolved
erik-krogh
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2022
guntrip
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2022
docs/codeql/codeql-language-guides/using-flow-labels-for-precise-data-flow-analysis.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Retargeted to release candidate branch |
…se-data-flow-analysis.rst Co-authored-by: Steve Guntrip <12534592+stevecat@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Thanks for the reviews ✨ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Now that it's easier to search for the remaining references to LGTM, I found a few more in these articles. Apologies to the Java and JavaScript teams for missing these articles in the earlier PRs.