Skip to content

Docs: update supported Swift versions #13657

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 5, 2023

Conversation

AlexDenisov
Copy link
Contributor

Should only be merged/deployed after CodeQL 2.13.5 release.

@@ -38,5 +38,5 @@
.. [7] JSX and Flow code, YAML, JSON, HTML, and XML files may also be analyzed with JavaScript files.
.. [8] The extractor requires Python 3 to run. To analyze Python 2.7 you should install both versions of Python.
.. [9] Requires glibc 2.17.
.. [10] Swift support is currently in beta. Support for the analysis of Swift 5.4-5.7 requires macOS. Swift 5.7.3 can also be analyzed using Linux.
.. [10] Swift support is currently in beta. Support for the analysis of Swift 5.4-5.8.1 requires macOS or Linux.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it true that we can now analyse Swift 5.4 - 5.7.2 on Linux?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe this the case with the latest fix, and Paolo confirmed that it works.

Copy link
Contributor

@geoffw0 geoffw0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

I'll leave the correct time to merge this up to you.

@AlexDenisov AlexDenisov merged commit dbffe54 into main Jul 5, 2023
@AlexDenisov AlexDenisov deleted the alexdenisov/update-supported-swift-version branch July 5, 2023 16:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants