Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Go: Fix getType on ImplicitVarArgsSlice #16457

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 8, 2024

Conversation

owen-mc
Copy link
Contributor

@owen-mc owen-mc commented May 8, 2024

It was not defined for built-in functions or for functions called via a function variable.

I've pulled this commit out of #16413 so that it can be reviewed and performance-tested in isolation. I don't think it needs a test because it is tested by that PR, and by all the tests for data flow through variadic arguments.

It was not defined for built-in functions or for functions called via
a function variable.
@owen-mc owen-mc requested a review from a team as a code owner May 8, 2024 14:26
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Go label May 8, 2024
@owen-mc owen-mc added the no-change-note-required This PR does not need a change note label May 8, 2024
smowton
smowton previously approved these changes May 8, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@smowton smowton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Conditional on testing, lgtm

@owen-mc owen-mc removed the no-change-note-required This PR does not need a change note label May 8, 2024
@owen-mc
Copy link
Contributor Author

owen-mc commented May 8, 2024

DCA is blissfully uneventful.

@owen-mc
Copy link
Contributor Author

owen-mc commented May 8, 2024

@smowton Please re-approve when you have a minute. I added a change note and it dismissed your approval.

@owen-mc owen-mc merged commit 279b2c7 into github:main May 8, 2024
14 checks passed
@owen-mc owen-mc deleted the go/fix-implicitvarargsslice-type branch May 8, 2024 19:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants