Skip to content

Improve query docs for java/java-util-concurrent-scheduledthreadpoolexecutor #19991

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 7, 2025
Merged

Improve query docs for java/java-util-concurrent-scheduledthreadpoolexecutor #19991

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 7, 2025

Conversation

tamasvajk
Copy link
Contributor

@tamasvajk tamasvajk commented Jul 7, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Followup to #19844.

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 7, 2025 12:23
@tamasvajk tamasvajk requested a review from a team as a code owner July 7, 2025 12:23
@tamasvajk tamasvajk requested a review from subatoi July 7, 2025 12:23
Copilot
Copilot AI reviewed Jul 7, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

subatoi
subatoi approved these changes Jul 7, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@subatoi subatoi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great!

@tamasvajk tamasvajk merged commit 8d16d02 into github:main Jul 7, 2025
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

Copilot code review Copilot Copilot left review comments

@subatoi subatoi subatoi approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
documentation Java
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@tamasvajk @subatoi