Skip to content

Python: random modernisations #3348

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 24, 2020

Conversation

RasmusWL
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

And we're making things a bit more clean since it's not *any* argument of `open()` that is a taint-sink.
@RasmusWL RasmusWL requested a review from a team as a code owner April 24, 2020 10:04
@RasmusWL RasmusWL requested review from tausbn and removed request for a team April 24, 2020 10:04
@RasmusWL
Copy link
Member Author

RasmusWL commented Apr 24, 2020

Oh, when I went to claim these 2 in https://github.com/github/codeql-python-team/issues/18 I can see that they are actually part of #2677 ...

I'm slightly more in favour of the changes to OpenNode in this PR than in https://github.com/Semmle/ql/pull/2677/files#diff-27b7dcc42bc64943dce69f99d4b1aa57L85-L90 though

@tausbn
Copy link
Contributor

tausbn commented Apr 24, 2020

That's fine by me. We're probably better off just closing the other PR and opening a new one, considering how many changes have happened in the mean time. (It looks to have gone quite stale...)

@RasmusWL
Copy link
Member Author

Nice. I just need you to hit that green approve button then ✔️ 😉 😉

Copy link
Contributor

@tausbn tausbn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tausbn tausbn merged commit 266de2e into github:master Apr 24, 2020
@RasmusWL RasmusWL deleted the python-random-modernisation branch April 24, 2020 12:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants