Skip to content

Conversation

strk
Copy link
Member

@strk strk commented Mar 17, 2017

No description provided.

@lunny lunny added this to the 1.2.0 milestone Mar 18, 2017
@lunny lunny added the type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality label Mar 18, 2017
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Mar 18, 2017

there is any screenshot?

@tboerger tboerger added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Mar 18, 2017
@strk strk force-pushed the readonly-openid-form branch from 12ad9b0 to 6522110 Compare March 18, 2017 13:10
@strk
Copy link
Member Author

strk commented Mar 18, 2017 via email

@strk
Copy link
Member Author

strk commented Mar 18, 2017

As I'm now on a computer with easier-to-take-screenshotter, here you go:

readonly-connect
readonly-create

@pgaskin
Copy link
Contributor

pgaskin commented Mar 19, 2017

@strk Speaking of screenshotters, use Kazam on linux. It is the best one.

@pgaskin
Copy link
Contributor

pgaskin commented Mar 19, 2017

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Mar 19, 2017
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Mar 20, 2017

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Mar 20, 2017
@lunny lunny merged commit 430cc4f into go-gitea:master Mar 20, 2017
@strk strk deleted the readonly-openid-form branch March 20, 2017 08:09
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 23, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants