Skip to content

Conversation

lafriks
Copy link
Member

@lafriks lafriks commented Jan 26, 2018

Fixes #3412

@lafriks lafriks added this to the 1.4.0 milestone Jan 26, 2018
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 26, 2018

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@9e87fe8). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #3413   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   35.64%           
=========================================
  Files             ?      281           
  Lines             ?    40552           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?    14456           
  Misses            ?    23962           
  Partials          ?     2134
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
modules/markup/html.go 54.56% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9e87fe8...ddae727. Read the comment docs.

@tboerger tboerger added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Jan 26, 2018
// CrossReferenceIssueNumericPattern matches string that references a numeric issue in a different repository
// e.g. gogits/gogs#12345
CrossReferenceIssueNumericPattern = regexp.MustCompile(`( |^)[0-9a-zA-Z]+/[0-9a-zA-Z]+#[0-9]+\b`)
CrossReferenceIssueNumericPattern = regexp.MustCompile(`( |^)[0-9a-zA-Z-_\.]+/[0-9a-zA-Z-_\.]+#[0-9]+\b`)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Before anyone researches this: did that already - both RegisterForm and CreateRepoForm in modules/auth use AlphaDashDot as a rule in the binding field, which in turn inside macaron is converted into "Every string that matches this should be rejected".

Copy link
Contributor

@thehowl thehowl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Jan 26, 2018
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Jan 27, 2018

LGTM. (Off topic: why the CI Successfully this PR?)

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Jan 27, 2018
@lafriks
Copy link
Member Author

lafriks commented Jan 27, 2018

@lunny it does succeed time to time :)

@lafriks lafriks merged commit a0c397d into go-gitea:master Jan 27, 2018
@lafriks lafriks deleted the fix/xref_repo_name branch January 27, 2018 12:33
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 23, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The use of dash (-) in repository names breaks cross-referencing in issues
5 participants