Skip to content

Conversation

6543
Copy link
Member

@6543 6543 commented Jan 11, 2020

close #9677

unauthentificated users now can use this function too but only for public repos

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Jan 11, 2020
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 11, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #9698 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9698      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   42.29%   42.29%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         592      592              
  Lines       78159    78159              
==========================================
- Hits        33058    33054       -4     
- Misses      41052    41055       +3     
- Partials     4049     4050       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
modules/avatar/avatar.go 48% <0%> (-6%) ⬇️
models/unit.go 62.16% <0%> (-5.41%) ⬇️
modules/process/manager.go 74.69% <0%> (-3.62%) ⬇️
routers/repo/view.go 38.59% <0%> (-0.88%) ⬇️
modules/log/event.go 65.64% <0%> (+1.02%) ⬆️
services/pull/check.go 50.67% <0%> (+2.02%) ⬆️
services/pull/temp_repo.go 34.18% <0%> (+2.56%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e69ca8c...60ed0c2. Read the comment docs.

@lunny lunny added this to the 1.12.0 milestone Jan 11, 2020
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Jan 11, 2020

@6543 It's better to add some integration tests.

@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented Jan 11, 2020

@lunny done

@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented Jan 11, 2020

Would be good to add test case also for anonymous user

@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented Jan 11, 2020

@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented Jan 11, 2020

@zeripath @lafriks can this fix go in now?

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Jan 11, 2020
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Jan 11, 2020
@lunny lunny merged commit 83f9359 into go-gitea:master Jan 12, 2020
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Jan 12, 2020

Please send back port.

@6543 6543 deleted the bug-fix-api branch January 12, 2020 09:08
6543 added a commit to 6543-forks/gitea that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2020
* fix

* fix options

* add TEST

Co-authored-by: Antoine GIRARD <sapk@users.noreply.github.com>
@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented Jan 12, 2020

done -> #9724

zeripath pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2020
* fix

* fix options

* add TEST

Co-authored-by: Antoine GIRARD <sapk@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: Antoine GIRARD <sapk@users.noreply.github.com>
@zeripath zeripath added the backport/done All backports for this PR have been created label Jan 12, 2020
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport/done All backports for this PR have been created lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] [API] ​/repos​/issues​/search
7 participants