-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.3k
Closed
Labels
FrozenDueToAgeNeedsInvestigationSomeone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.modules
Milestone
Description
What version of Go are you using (go version
)?
$ go version go version go1.12.1 linux/amd64
Does this issue reproduce with the latest release?
Yes
What operating system and processor architecture are you using (go env
)?
go env
Output
$ go env GOARCH="amd64" GOHOSTARCH="amd64" GOHOSTOS="linux" GOOS="linux"
What did you do?
Create a new go module
Getting a module by branch for testing using:
go get github.com/paulbdavis/go-version-issue@feature/branch
The repo has the branches set up as follows
86fe9a2 * origin/feature/branch-direct other feature stuff, direct from master with tag
4267841 | * origin/feature/branch feature changes
de1fa6d | * origin/dev Merge branch 'master' into dev
| |\
| |/
|/|
a8fe481 * | v0.2.0 origin/master Merge branch 'dev'
|\ \
| |/
3de82f8 | * v0.1.1-dev-tag dev change
|/
a7082b4 * v0.1.0 init
What did you expect to see?
I would expect the v0.2.0
tag to be used to generate the psuedo version, as it is the latest one
What did you see instead?
When getting the package it uses the v0.1.1-dev-tag
tag to generate the psuedo version in the go.mod
file
module github.com/paulbdavis/go-version-issue-consumer
go 1.12
require github.com/paulbdavis/go-version-issue v0.1.1-dev-tag.0.20190405180849-426784105212 // indirect
Getting the module on the feature/branch-direct
generates a "correct" psuedo version based on v0.2.0
bumping it to v0.2.1
?
module github.com/paulbdavis/go-version-issue-consumer
go 1.12
require github.com/paulbdavis/go-version-issue v0.2.1-0.20190405181040-86fe9a2567f5 // indirect
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
FrozenDueToAgeNeedsInvestigationSomeone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.modules