testing: change -run regexp to make / have usual precedence

[dnephin]

The go test -run flag can be used to select multiple root test cases. This example will run the 3 tests which match the regex exactly:

go test -run '^(TestOne|TestTwo|TestThree)$'

As far as I can tell, the logic for handling subtests makes it impossible to do the same with subtest cases. It seems to be possible to run multiple root test cases, with a single subtest case:

go test -run '^TestOne$|^TestTwo$|^TestThree$/^SubTestA$'

But adding anything after the / is assumed to be a sub-sub test, and does not match the same way.

Some other things that I tried, which do not work:

Matches any SubTestA, not just the one from TestThree

^(TestOne|TestTwo|TestThree)$/^SubTestA$

Does not match any subtests

Because of how parenthesis are handled in splitRegex

(^TestOne$|^TestTwo$|^TestThree$/^SubTestA$)

Would it be reasonable to support this with the -run flag? Looking over the matching logic in src/testing it seems like this may not be a small change.

[ianlancetaylor]

CC @mpvl

[dnephin]

I see there was some discussion about this in https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/19122/. I think the | character is not accounted for (none of the tests include a case with one). I can't see any way to make this work splitting the regex by /.

Maybe the same goal can be accomplished by adding [^/]* before and after any non-anchored / in the regex? I guess that only solves part of it. I'm not sure how to have parent tests match the regex so that all subtests are evaluated.

[rsc]

The testing package must have some way to figure out whether the top-level test matches (and should be started), separate from the rest of the expression, so that's why it splits on unparenthesized slashes. But this changes the ordinary precedence of concatenation-with-slash to be higher than alternation (|), which was probably a mistake. Maybe the fix is just to split on |s first.

That is, as shown above

'^TestOne$|^TestTwo$|^TestThree$/^SubTestA$'

is implicitly

^(TestOne|TestTwo|TestThree)$/^SubTestA$

and there's no way to override those implicit parens. Splitting on pipes first would essentially remove those implicit parens.

I'd be willing to try that (splitting first on pipes) at the start of a cycle and see if it breaks anything. Thoughts?

/cc @mpvl

[rogpeppe]

Wouldn't that break usage like this, where the intention is to run several of the TestFoo subtests?

go test -run 'TestFoo/First|Second'

I'm not sure that this behaviour can be changed now for that reason.

... and if we decide that the behaviour is ok to be changed, for the record, I still think that things would be better if all these patterns were implicitly anchored (I often get bitten by several tests running when I only intended one because the test name
I've specified is a prefix of others and I've forgotten to add a $ qualifier).

As another possibility for fixing this issue, how about allowing multiple -run flags?

For example:

go test -run '^TestOne$' -run '^TestTwo$' -run '^TestThree$/^SubTestA$'

Another ability I'd like to see is the ability to exclude tests rather than include them, when there's a problematic test, but that's another proposal :)

[dnephin]

A new flag (-run-regex ?) that accepted a regex and did not modify the regex would be one easy way to solve it. I understand there is a desire to keep the number of flags to a minimum, so I imagine this option is not desirable.

Allowing the -run flag to be repeated should work in a backwards compatible way.

I think splitting on | could work, but it would require parens to be added to some values. Assuming parenthesis are handled the same way they are now, which is that any / or | within an open left paren does not cause a split.

TestFoo/First|Second would need to be written as TestFoo/(First|Second).

[rsc]

@rogpeppe, you're right that we'd be changing the meaning of that syntax, but X/Y|Z not meaning "X/Y or Z" is arguably the same kind of bug. You can always write X/(Y|Z) to get that meaning, and most people probably would already (because that's what you'd have to say to get that meaning in a plain text regexp match).

The problem that this change would solve is that A/B|C/D today means A/(B|C)/D, in contradiction to the plain text regexp match, and worse there is no correction, no way to get "A/B or C/D".

The suggestion solution - splitting on pipes before splitting on slashes - more closely respects the text matches, by making the pipe operator a looser binding than the implicit concatenation around slash. And when it's not what you want, parens can always be added. Pipe is the only operator that binds looser than concatenation, so it's the only instance of this problem that we'd need to address.

An alternative would be to go back to exactly the plain text semantics, with the added rule that matching right up to a slash is allowed. That would require extra support in the regexp engine and would still be special, but even more differently special (for example, -run='^X$/^Y$' would not work anymore), so I'm not inclined to go down that road instead.

The current syntax was a bit of a compromise, but it does work well in general, and so the general design might as well stay. But it still seems like we should fix this precedence problem that has no workaround. Yes, it does change the meaning of certain corner cases - by design - but it changes them in a way that can always be overridden with parens (in contrast to today).

[rsc]

Does anyone object to making the change described in my comment above?

[rsc]

Based on the discussion above, this seems like a likely accept
(for early in cycle, understanding that we might need to back it out).

[rsc]

No change in consensus, so accepted.

[firelizzard18]

I am working on vscode-go, and AFAIK the current syntax makes it impossible to run an arbitrary set of tests and sub tests. If I understand the proposal correctly, if this is merged, -run ^(A|B/C)$ would run the base test A and the sub test B/C. That should fix the problem.

[gopherbot]

Change https://golang.org/cl/343883 mentions this issue: testing: increase alternation precedence

[aclements]

Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but isn't the proposal in #39904 (comment) in direct contradiction to the regexp/syntax.Cut behavior proposed in #44254?

[firelizzard18]

@aclements I thought so too, but I think it would work if you first Cut by | and then Cut by /