Replies: 1 comment
-
|
I will move this over to discussions. I am not yet convinced this is the way to go. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The aggregation syntax - apart from being quite undocumented - needs much explanation.
Erik Meijer suggested via LinkedIn:
| I would love to be able to write something like
The reason for "do transformations"
|> do fn:group_by(...)was to have something declarative so that it could be implemented and optimized differently. However, with a judiciously designed sublanguage, that may still be possible.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions