@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ to include them.
187187To ensure you get a JSON result that conforms 100% to the graphql spec, you should call ` toSpecification ` on the result and then
188188send that back as JSON.
189189
190- This will ensure that the result follows the specification outlined in http ://facebook .github.io/graphql/#sec-Response
190+ This will ensure that the result follows the specification outlined in https ://graphql .github.io/graphql-spec/draft /#sec-Response
191191
192192
193193{{< highlight java "linenos=table" >}}
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ The data fetcher here is responsible for executing the mutation and returning so
304304 // be maps. You can convert them to POJOs inside the data fetcher if that
305305 // suits your code better
306306 //
307- // See http ://facebook .github.io/graphql/October2016 /#sec-Input-Objects
307+ // See https ://graphql .github.io/graphql-spec/draft /#sec-Input-Objects
308308 //
309309 Map<String, Object> episodeInputMap = environment.getArgument("episode");
310310 Map<String, Object> reviewInputMap = environment.getArgument("review");
@@ -466,10 +466,10 @@ have to do *enemies* first followed by *friends*, which would be less efficient.
466466It will however assemble the results in order. The query result will follow the graphql specification and return object values
467467assembled in query field order. Only the execution of data fetching is free to be in any order.
468468
469- This behaviour is allowed in the graphql specification and in fact is actively encouraged http ://facebook .github.io/graphql/#sec-Query
469+ This behaviour is allowed in the graphql specification and in fact is actively encouraged https ://graphql .github.io/graphql-spec/draft /#sec-Query
470470for read only queries.
471471
472- See ` specification <http ://facebook .github.io/graphql/ #sec-Normal-evaluation> ` _ for details.
472+ See ` specification <https ://graphql .github.io/graphql-spec/draft/ #sec-Normal-and-Serial-Execution> ` for details.
473473
474474
475475## AsyncSerialExecutionStrategy
0 commit comments