Skip to content

new landing page #2078

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 190 commits into
base: source
Choose a base branch
from
Open

new landing page #2078

wants to merge 190 commits into from

Conversation

hasparus
Copy link
Contributor

@hasparus hasparus commented Aug 13, 2025

Description

Howdy. I updated the landing page according to the new designs discussed in graphql/community-wg#21.

If you're interested in reading it step by step in chunks bigger than one commit, you can find the PRs reviewed by @saihaj in my fork hasparus/graphql.github.io/pulls?q=is+new-landing+.

image

Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 13, 2025

@hasparus is attempting to deploy a commit to the The GraphQL Foundation Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 13, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
graphql-github-io Ready Ready Preview Comment Aug 19, 2025 10:12pm

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should the nextImageExportOptimizer folder be tracked under git or is it a build asset that can be removed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It predates my involvement, but I assumed it was tracked initially to make the builds on CI and deploys faster as it's idempotent.

To be fair, I'd love to have some architectural decision record on the choice of the optimizer. I think I can guess a few reasons (using output: export is one of them), but (as IMHO these placeholders and their transitions are subpar) in the future we could consider running an image proxy or generate placeholders with a different solution.

We can try to gitignore this directory and see if anything breaks on staging. cc @saihaj

Copy link
Member

@benjie benjie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Website looks great, and I love the various animations - very informative! Here's a few minor wording tweaks for the homepage.

{[
"Deliver high-performance user experience at scale",
"Secure and stabilize your API with a strongly typed schema and validated queries",
"Reduce dependencies through efficient, distributed development",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can someone explain this one to me? What dependencies are we reducing?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@saihaj is this a microservices argument? shall we swap it with sth else?

Copy link
Member

@saihaj saihaj Aug 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah the idea is about how federated subgraphs let's smaller team and push features to prod. With a monolithic graph you have to schedule deployments and work across teams (that is what "dependency" is meant here) but with a federated subgraphs your team can deploy their subgraphs and the gateway automatically will update (composition and all the tooling around it make it possible).

cc @bignimbus @Urigo in case you have better copy for this use case

hasparus and others added 5 commits August 16, 2025 03:00
Co-authored-by: Benjie <benjie@jemjie.com>
Co-authored-by: Benjie <benjie@jemjie.com>
* Extract edges and boxes out from the components.

* Make diagram boxes and edges responsive

* Make the diagram less tall

* Animate client edge on small screens

* Animate server edges on small screens

* Remove next step on background click per Uri's request

* Rotate query sideways on small screens
Co-authored-by: Benjie <benjie@jemjie.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants