Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Look for ASE in exonic loci alone #34

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
May 17, 2016

Conversation

gatoravi
Copy link
Contributor

  • Annotate polymorphisms before looking for ASE at those sites.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 29, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 85.511% when pulling d66471e on gatoravi:ase_exonic_only into 1cd2933 on griffithlab:master.

@malachig
Copy link
Member

malachig commented May 4, 2016

As discussed in our last meeting, I think this is a good option, especially for species with high quality reference transcriptomes (like human). Will be interesting to see what effect this has on the results and run time.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 11, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 85.511% when pulling 64f2ae3 on gatoravi:ase_exonic_only into 1cd2933 on griffithlab:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 17, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+2.9%) to 88.636% when pulling 8a96582 on gatoravi:ase_exonic_only into 1cd2933 on griffithlab:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 17, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+2.9%) to 88.636% when pulling 9954b3c on gatoravi:ase_exonic_only into 1cd2933 on griffithlab:master.

@gatoravi gatoravi merged commit 46328de into griffithlab:master May 17, 2016
@gatoravi gatoravi deleted the ase_exonic_only branch May 17, 2016 18:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants