Skip to content

Conversation

@greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

node-eval just published its new version 1.0.3.

State Update 🚀
Dependency node-eval
New version 1.0.3
Type dependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of node-eval.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ greenkeeper upgrade

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 2d93b5c on greenkeeper-node-eval-1.0.3 into 07c3e6b on master.

@Yeti-or Yeti-or force-pushed the greenkeeper-node-eval-1.0.3 branch from 2d93b5c to 4927077 Compare August 1, 2016 07:58
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 4927077 on greenkeeper-node-eval-1.0.3 into a579eca on master.

@Yeti-or Yeti-or merged commit a4c2df6 into master Aug 1, 2016
@Yeti-or Yeti-or deleted the greenkeeper-node-eval-1.0.3 branch August 1, 2016 22:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants