Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tabulator: fix valuesLookup set up for older list-like editors #6192

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 12, 2024

Conversation

maximlt
Copy link
Member

@maximlt maximlt commented Jan 12, 2024

Supersedes #5945

The statement was incomplete, based on the logic d2e6671 it should set valuesLookup to True.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 12, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (36dfd10) 40.67% compared to head (f58027a) 84.44%.

Files Patch % Lines
panel/widgets/tables.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6192       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   40.67%   84.44%   +43.76%     
===========================================
  Files         299      299               
  Lines       44663    44677       +14     
===========================================
+ Hits        18168    37726    +19558     
+ Misses      26495     6951    -19544     
Flag Coverage Δ
ui-tests 40.66% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
unitexamples-tests 72.24% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@philippjfr philippjfr merged commit 04a39b9 into main Jan 12, 2024
14 of 15 checks passed
@philippjfr philippjfr deleted the fix_tabulator_valueslookup_backcompat branch January 12, 2024 17:26
philippjfr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2024
This was referenced Jan 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants