Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evacuation Center Icon #248

Closed
MarkCupitt opened this issue Dec 7, 2014 · 12 comments
Closed

Evacuation Center Icon #248

MarkCupitt opened this issue Dec 7, 2014 · 12 comments
Labels

Comments

@MarkCupitt
Copy link

tag is evacuation_centre=yes
It will be tagged with Churches, Schools, Sports COmplexes, schools, etc
Can be Poi or Way

Suggest Icon at Zoom Level 12 down, so they can be seen in a broader context
Maybe the Icon could be just a red Circle?? Simple. and no issues over licensing of the icon
A red color would be nice so they stood out in emergency

@yohanboniface
Copy link
Collaborator

If we intend to support this tag widely, I think we should also add a wiki page and add it to the JOSM preset.

About the icon, we made the choice not to add any colours to the icons, to make the rendering neutral, because it is intended to be used as background map also. For example, if you want to have the icons red and prominent, you can use a dynamic layer on uMap with an overpass query:

http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/evacuation-centers_23483#17/13.35564/123.71777

Anyway, I'm looking at this :)

@yohanboniface
Copy link
Collaborator

One question: I'm not sure to understand why we have that much evacuation_center=yes here: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/evacuation-centers_23483#20/13.16195/123.63302

Isn't supposed to be, say, one building that should be such tagged? Just to be sure I'm understanding the usage.

@yohanboniface
Copy link
Collaborator

One other question: is the tag supposed to be temporarily added to a feature? Say "this school has been elected as evacuation center during the period of Ruby typhoon", but may or may not be the same in the future when the situation changes?

i.e., for example, when a building is both a school and an evacuation center, should I remove the school icon because it's an evacuation center first until new situation, or should I find a way to keep both informations in the same time (i.e. school and evacuation center for a same building)?

@MarkCupitt
Copy link
Author

Hi Yohan, ok to all .. The UMap might be enough can teh overpass query be
used in JOSM like a TMS layer?

Regards

Mark Cupitt

"If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence"

See me on Open Street Map https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt

See me on LinkedIn http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt

See me on StackExchange http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c

The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom
it is addressed and may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute,
or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in
error, please notify the sender immediately and

delete the email and any attachments.

On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Yohan Boniface notifications@github.com
wrote:

If we intend to support this tag widely, I think we should also add a wiki
page and add it to the JOSM preset.

About the icon, we made the choice not to add any colours to the icons, to
make the rendering neutral, because it is intended to be used as background
map also. For example, if you want to have the icons red and prominent, you
can use a dynamic layer on uMap with an overpass query:

http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/evacuation-centers_23483#17/13.35564/123.71777

Anyway, I'm looking at this :)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#248 (comment).

@MarkCupitt
Copy link
Author

Hi Yhan, this is the issue, It is a dual purpose, but if we use you Umap
sugestion or a Tms Layer, etc, it means that no need to change icons

The UMap looks attractive.

Regards

Mark Cupitt

"If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence"

See me on Open Street Map https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt

See me on LinkedIn http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt

See me on StackExchange http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c

The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom
it is addressed and may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute,
or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in
error, please notify the sender immediately and

delete the email and any attachments.

On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Yohan Boniface notifications@github.com
wrote:

One other question: is the tag supposed to be temporarily added to a
feature? Say "this school has been elected as evacuation center during the
period of Ruby typhoon", but may or may not be the same in the future when
the situation changes?

i.e., for example, when a building is both a school and an evacuation
center, should I remove the school icon because it's an evacuation center
first until new situation, or should I find a way to keep both informations
in the same time (i.e. school and evacuation center for a same building)?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#248 (comment).

@MarkCupitt
Copy link
Author

Hi Yohan

I imagine these are different rooms in a school or different meeting places.

They would have to be sanitized. Whilst they have been tagged, have never
been really used, this is the first attempt.

If they can be visualized overlaid on a map and in JOSM, Id, etc, probably
they would be rationalized a lot more.

Having seen the UMap, this is the best option for now, if it is possible to
get this as a TMS Layer as well for general use on other system, then that
would be perfect

Regards

Mark Cupitt

"If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence"

See me on Open Street Map https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt

See me on LinkedIn http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt

See me on StackExchange http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c

The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom
it is addressed and may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute,
or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in
error, please notify the sender immediately and

delete the email and any attachments.

On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Yohan Boniface notifications@github.com
wrote:

One question: I'm not sure to understand why we have that much
evacuation_center=yes here:
http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/evacuation-centers_23483#20/13.16195/123.63302

Isn't supposed to be, say, one building that should be such tagged? Just
to be sure I'm understanding the usage.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#248 (comment).

@MarkCupitt
Copy link
Author

Ohh, I see, it is a way, not a poi defining an evacuation area.

Regards

Mark Cupitt

"If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence"

See me on Open Street Map https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt

See me on LinkedIn http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt

See me on StackExchange http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c

The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom
it is addressed and may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute,
or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in
error, please notify the sender immediately and

delete the email and any attachments.

On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Yohan Boniface notifications@github.com
wrote:

One question: I'm not sure to understand why we have that much
evacuation_center=yes here:
http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/evacuation-centers_23483#20/13.16195/123.63302

Isn't supposed to be, say, one building that should be such tagged? Just
to be sure I'm understanding the usage.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#248 (comment).

@MarkCupitt
Copy link
Author

Here is an Overpass Query

http://overpass-turbo.eu/?q=PCEtLQpUaGlzIGhhxIhiZWVuIGfEj2VyYXRlZCBieSB0aGUgb3bElHDEi3MtdHVyYm8gd2l6YXJkLsSExJ_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_IvMWYxJTIv8iWyYHIosiyyJvJhseAyJ_Jise1yYzJjsetyYzJk8iryILIhMixx6bItMmcyI3Hlsivx5rEl3LJo8iXyabHpsmoyJ3Jq8eyyYvIp8mNx7rJscmHyZTIrGXIrsi7yLDJmcm4yLbJusi6yJDJocm_x57JgMeiyoLJkcqEyYfKhsezya3KicmvyKbIh8aXybLJlceGx4jJtsmRypXIjMi4yI7JvHNpxJfKgMmlyZnKocmqyYnKh8qlyKPKi8qJyqvHhMiDyIXKlMmbypbKs8m7ypJfyrbKuMqcyaTKnsq7yYXKhcq-yqTKn8qKyKXKjMipybMiyK3Ir8qvxpfKscmdyrTLjcuPx53IlcqBy5THssmpx7_Ko8qIy4HLm8eLyY3Gmcabxp3GiMahcMS5x5vGjsWexpHGk8a7Lcu4y7vEvMWvbcmXxbXErGTIhcmmPMWaxZByxYHIgMeEZG93yLDMjsyFy73MiMeIxbVza8qQZXTFucS4x4hyxbXGo2Fkx5hsx4nHtsmNxafFqcWrxa10Pg&c=B8TZX6nI-G&R

Regards

Mark Cupitt

"If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence"

See me on Open Street Map https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt

See me on LinkedIn http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt

See me on StackExchange http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c

The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom
it is addressed and may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute,
or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in
error, please notify the sender immediately and

delete the email and any attachments.

On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Markware Software Services <
markwaresoftware@gmail.com> wrote:

Ohh, I see, it is a way, not a poi defining an evacuation area.

Regards

Mark Cupitt

"If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence"

See me on Open Street Map https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt

See me on LinkedIn http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt

See me on StackExchange http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c

The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom
it is addressed and may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute,
or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in
error, please notify the sender immediately and

delete the email and any attachments.

On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Yohan Boniface notifications@github.com
wrote:

One question: I'm not sure to understand why we have that much
evacuation_center=yes here:
http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/evacuation-centers_23483#20/13.16195/123.63302

Isn't supposed to be, say, one building that should be such tagged? Just
to be sure I'm understanding the usage.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#248 (comment)
.

@MarkCupitt
Copy link
Author

Hi Yohan, if it is possible to figure the ways and pois for display a UMap
would be the way to go

Been trying to add a dynamic layer but no success so far

Regards

Mark Cupitt

"If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence"

See me on Open Street Map https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt

See me on LinkedIn http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt

See me on StackExchange http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c

The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom
it is addressed and may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute,
or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in
error, please notify the sender immediately and

delete the email and any attachments.

On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Markware Software Services <
markwaresoftware@gmail.com> wrote:

Here is an Overpass Query

http://overpass-turbo.eu/?q=PCEtLQpUaGlzIGhhxIhiZWVuIGfEj2VyYXRlZCBieSB0aGUgb3bElHDEi3MtdHVyYm8gd2l6YXJkLsSExJ_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_IvMWYxJTIv8iWyYHIosiyyJvJhseAyJ_Jise1yYzJjsetyYzJk8iryILIhMixx6bItMmcyI3Hlsivx5rEl3LJo8iXyabHpsmoyJ3Jq8eyyYvIp8mNx7rJscmHyZTIrGXIrsi7yLDJmcm4yLbJusi6yJDJocm_x57JgMeiyoLJkcqEyYfKhsezya3KicmvyKbIh8aXybLJlceGx4jJtsmRypXIjMi4yI7JvHNpxJfKgMmlyZnKocmqyYnKh8qlyKPKi8qJyqvHhMiDyIXKlMmbypbKs8m7ypJfyrbKuMqcyaTKnsq7yYXKhcq-yqTKn8qKyKXKjMipybMiyK3Ir8qvxpfKscmdyrTLjcuPx53IlcqBy5THssmpx7_Ko8qIy4HLm8eLyY3Gmcabxp3GiMahcMS5x5vGjsWexpHGk8a7Lcu4y7vEvMWvbcmXxbXErGTIhcmmPMWaxZByxYHIgMeEZG93yLDMjsyFy73MiMeIxbVza8qQZXTFucS4x4hyxbXGo2Fkx5hsx4nHtsmNxafFqcWrxa10Pg&c=B8TZX6nI-G&R

Regards

Mark Cupitt

"If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence"

See me on Open Street Map https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt

See me on LinkedIn http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt

See me on StackExchange http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c

The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom
it is addressed and may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute,
or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in
error, please notify the sender immediately and

delete the email and any attachments.

On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Markware Software Services <
markwaresoftware@gmail.com> wrote:

Ohh, I see, it is a way, not a poi defining an evacuation area.

Regards

Mark Cupitt

"If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence"

See me on Open Street Map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt

See me on LinkedIn http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt

See me on StackExchange
http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c

The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to
whom it is addressed and may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute,
or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in
error, please notify the sender immediately and

delete the email and any attachments.

On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Yohan Boniface <notifications@github.com

wrote:

One question: I'm not sure to understand why we have that much
evacuation_center=yes here:
http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/evacuation-centers_23483#20/13.16195/123.63302

Isn't supposed to be, say, one building that should be such tagged? Just
to be sure I'm understanding the usage.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#248 (comment)
.

@yohanboniface
Copy link
Collaborator

if it is possible to figure the ways and pois for display a UMap would be the way to go

Sorry, my fault, I used a wrong overpass query, from taginfo button.

Now it should be better:

http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/evacuation-centers_23483#10/13.0574/123.8379

@MarkCupitt
Copy link
Author

Nice, thats all we need. I think.

Would you mind giving me edit on this I would like to learn.

I think close this issue as not needed on the map for now ..

Brilliant Yohan, will post to the Activation group

Regards

Mark Cupitt

"If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence"

See me on Open Street Map https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark_Cupitt

See me on LinkedIn http://ph.linkedin.com/in/markcupitt

See me on StackExchange http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/17846/mark-c

The contents of this email are intended only for the individual(s) to whom
it is addressed and may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not disclose, copy, distribute,
or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in
error, please notify the sender immediately and

delete the email and any attachments.

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Yohan Boniface notifications@github.com
wrote:

if it is possible to figure the ways and pois for display a UMap would be
the way to go

Sorry, my fault, I made a wrong overpass query, from taginfo button.

Now it should be better:

http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/evacuation-centers_23483#10/13.0574/123.8379


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#248 (comment).

@yohanboniface
Copy link
Collaborator

Nice, thats all we need. I think.
I think close this issue as not needed on the map for now ..

OK, I'm closing, let's see how it evolves, and see if we need an icon on the background map or not. Then we'll reopen if needed.

Would you mind giving me edit on this I would like to learn.

You got it :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants