Support local GGUF in VLLM and use HF tokenizer #943 #972
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Dear maintainers,
Because VLLM have already supported local GGUF file, and the enforce_eager is fix to True, all we need to do is use HF tokenizer for local GGUF in inference. (As mentioned in the VLLM document)

And here is the example of local GGUF in VLLM document

I test the following scripts for VLLM model in GGUF format
And the log and evaluation results are attached as follow.
results_2025-09-17T14-36-32.075650.json
Please help to review,
Thank you,
Eli Chen