Migrate IexecOrderManagement unit tests

[james-toussaint]

Tests

    Manage orders when presign operations sent by owners
      ✓ Should manage app order when presign operation sent by app provider
      ✓ Should manage dataset order when presign operation sent by dataset provider
      ✓ Should manage workerpool order when presign operation sent by scheduler
      ✓ Should manage request order when presign operation sent by requester
      ✓ Should match orders when presign operations sent by owners
    Manage orders when presign operations signed by owners
      ✓ Should manage app order when presign operation signed by app provider
      ✓ Should manage dataset order when presign operation signed by dataset provider
      ✓ Should manage workerpool order when presign operation signed by workerpool provider
      ✓ Should manage request order when presign operation signed by requester
      ✓ Should match orders when presign operations signed by owners
    Manage orders when close operations sent by owners
      ✓ Should manage app order when close operation sent by app provider
      ✓ Should manage dataset order when close operation sent by dataset provider
      ✓ Should manage workerpool order when close operation sent by scheduler
      ✓ Should manage request order when close operation sent by requester
    Manage orders when close operations signed by owners
      ✓ Should manage app order when close operation signed by app provider
      ✓ Should manage dataset order when close operation signed by dataset provider
      ✓ Should manage workerpool order when close operation signed by scheduler
      ✓ Should manage request order when close operation signed by requester
    Should not manage orders when invalid sender or signature
      ✓ Should not manage app order when invalid sender or signature
      ✓ Should not manage dataset order when invalid sender or signature
      ✓ Should not manage workerpool order when invalid sender or signature
      ✓ Should not manage request order when invalid sender or signature

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.75%. Comparing base (05616c8) to head (cf94763).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #101   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    83.75%   83.75%           
========================================
  Files           34       34           
  Lines         1077     1077           
  Branches       202      222   +20     
========================================
  Hits           902      902           
  Misses         175      175           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[zguesmi]

Have you considered something like:

        const appOperation = {
            assetName: 'App',
            providerAddress: appProvider.address,
            tx: iexecPocoAsAppProvider.manageAppOrder(createOrderOperation(appOrder, OrderOperationEnum.SIGN)),
            orderHash: appOrderHash
        };

        [appOperation, datasetOperation, workerpoolOperation, requesterOperation].forEach((operation) => {
            it(`Should presign ${operation.assetName} order when operation is sent by app provider`, async () => {
                await expect(operation.tx)
                    .to.emit(iexecPoco, `Signed${operation.assetName}Order`)
                    .withArgs(operation.orderHash);
                expect(await iexecPoco.viewPresigned(operation.orderHash)).equal(operation.providerAddress);
                expect(await iexecPoco.verifyPresignature(operation.providerAddress, operation.orderHash)).is.true;
                expect(
                    await iexecPoco.verifyPresignatureOrSignature(
                        operation.providerAddress,
                        operation.orderHash,
                        NULL.SIGNATURE,
                    ),
                ).is.true;
            });
        });

?

[gfournieriExec]

Thanks !