Skip to content

Conversation

gfournieriExec
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.02%. Comparing base (bc6a578) to head (1909a5c).
Report is 23 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #125   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    84.02%   84.02%           
========================================
  Files           35       35           
  Lines         1077     1077           
  Branches       201      221   +20     
========================================
  Hits           905      905           
  Misses         172      172           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@james-toussaint james-toussaint left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

.setName(ensRegistry.address, newENSName)
.then((tx) => tx.wait());

const nameHash = ethers.utils.namehash(`${app.address.substring(2)}.addr.reverse`);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can eventually declare this function once and reuse it

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done and factorized reused code thanks

).to.be.revertedWith('caller is not the owner');
});

it('Should reject invalid configuration', async () => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder why there is no check on _newWorkerStakeRatioPolicy 🤔

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess there is no upper limit for the stake.

@gfournieriExec gfournieriExec merged commit 7f00ecd into develop Sep 13, 2024
5 checks passed
@gfournieriExec gfournieriExec deleted the feature/migrate-ressources-test branch September 13, 2024 15:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants