Skip to content

Conversation

gfournieriExec
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@gfournieriExec gfournieriExec self-assigned this Apr 25, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 25, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.50%. Comparing base (85844a4) to head (c520fa3).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #218   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    84.50%   84.50%           
========================================
  Files           35       35           
  Lines         1084     1084           
  Branches       221      221           
========================================
  Hits           916      916           
  Misses         168      168           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@gfournieriExec gfournieriExec marked this pull request as draft April 25, 2025 13:50
@gfournieriExec gfournieriExec marked this pull request as ready for review April 29, 2025 12:00
README.md Outdated
Comment on lines 179 to 183
### Automated Verification via GitHub Actions
The GitHub Actions workflow automatically handles contract verification after deployment. It waits 60 seconds for the contracts to be indexed by the block explorer before attempting verification.
The verification process uses the same script (`./scripts/verify.ts`) that reads deployment artifacts to verify each contract with its correct constructor arguments.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

@zguesmi zguesmi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot ✔️ !

Comment on lines 17 to 21
const deploymentPath = path.resolve(`deployments/${networkName}/ERC1538Proxy.json`);
if (!fs.existsSync(deploymentPath)) {
console.error(`ERC1538Proxy deployment file not found for network: ${networkName}`);
process.exit(1);
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
const deploymentPath = path.resolve(`deployments/${networkName}/ERC1538Proxy.json`);
if (!fs.existsSync(deploymentPath)) {
console.error(`ERC1538Proxy deployment file not found for network: ${networkName}`);
process.exit(1);
}

@gfournieriExec gfournieriExec merged commit f83a6cf into develop May 13, 2025
4 checks passed
@gfournieriExec gfournieriExec deleted the feature/github-actions-deployment-pipeline branch May 13, 2025 07:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants