A Rust implementation of DiskANN (Disk-based Approximate Nearest Neighbor search) using the Vamana graph algorithm. This project provides an efficient and scalable solution for large-scale vector similarity search with minimal memory footprint, as an alternative to the widely used in-memory HNSW algorithm.
This implementation follows the DiskANN paper's approach:
- Using the Vamana graph algorithm for index construction, pruning and refinement (in parallel)
- Memory-mapping the index file for efficient disk-based access (via memmap2)
- Implementing beam search with medoid entry points (in parallel)
- Supporting Euclidean, Cosine, Hamming and other distance metrics via a generic distance trait
- Maintaining minimal memory footprint during search operations
-
Single-file storage: All index data stored in one memory-mapped file in the following way:
[ metadata_len:u64 ][ metadata (bincode) ][ padding up to vectors_offset ] [ vectors (num * dim * f32) ][ adjacency (num * max_degree * u32) ] `vectors_offset` is a fixed 1 MiB gap by default.
-
Vamana graph construction: Efficient graph building with Ξ±-pruning, with rayon for concurrent and parallel construction
-
Memory-efficient search: Uses beam search that visits < 1% of vectors
-
Generic over any vector: suport various types of vector input.
-
Distance metrics: Support for Euclidean, Cosine and Hamming similarity et.al. via anndists. A generic distance trait that can be extended to other distance metrics
-
Medoid-based entry points: Smart starting points for search
-
Parallel query processing: Using rayon for concurrent searches. Note: this may increase the loaded pages during memory map
-
Minimal memory footprint: ~330MB RAM for 2GB index (16% of file size)
-
Extensitve benchmarks: Speed, accuracy and memory consumption benchmark with HNSW (both in-memory and on-disk)
use anndists::dist::{DistL2, DistCosine}; // or your own Distance types
use diskann_rs::{DiskANN, DiskAnnParams};
// Your vectors to index (all rows must share the same dimension)
let vectors: Vec<Vec<f32>> = vec![
vec![0.1, 0.2, 0.3],
vec![0.4, 0.5, 0.6],
];
// Easiest: build with defaults (M=64, L_build=128, alpha=1.2)
let index = DiskANN::<f32, DistL2>::build_index_default(&vectors, DistL2, "index.db")?;
// Or: custom construction parameters
let params = DiskAnnParams {
max_degree: 48, // max neighbors per node
build_beam_width: 128, // construction beam width
alpha: 1.2, // Ξ± for pruning
};
let index2 = DiskANN::<f32, DistCosine>::build_index_with_params(
&vectors,
DistCosine {},
"index_cos.db",
params,
)?;
use anndists::dist::DistL2;
use diskann_rs::DiskANN;
// If you built with DistL2 and defaults:
let index = DiskANN::<f32, DistL2>::open_index_default_metric("index.db")?;
// Or, explicitly provide the distance you built with:
let index2 = DiskANN::<f32, DistL2>::open_index_with("index.db", DistL2)?;
use anndists::dist::DistL2;
use diskann_rs::DiskANN;
let index = DiskANN::<f32, DistL2>::open_index_default_metric("index.db")?;
let query: Vec<f32> = vec![0.1, 0.2, 0.4]; // length must match the indexed dim
let k = 10;
let beam = 256; // search beam width
// (IDs, distance)
let hits: Vec<(u32, f32)> = index.search_with_dists(&query, 10, beam);
// `neighbors` are the IDs of the k nearest vectors
let neighbors: Vec<u32> = index.search(&query, k, beam);
use anndists::dist::DistL2;
use diskann_rs::DiskANN;
use rayon::prelude::*;
let index = DiskANN::<f32, DistL2>::open_index_default_metric("index.db")?;
// Suppose you have a batch of queries
let query_batch: Vec<Vec<f32>> = /* ... */;
let results: Vec<Vec<u32>> = query_batch
.par_iter()
.map(|q| index.search(q, 10, 256))
.collect();
- Index Build Time: O(n * max_degree * beam_width)
- Disk Space: n * (dimension * 4 + max_degree * 4) bytes
- Search Time: O(beam_width * log n) - typically visits < 1% of dataset
- Memory Usage: O(beam_width) during search
- Query Throughput: Scales linearly with CPU cores
max_degree
: 32-64 for most datasetsbuild_beam_width
: 128-256 for good graph qualityalpha
: 1.2-2.0 (higher = more diverse neighbors)
beam_width
: 128 or larger (trade-off between speed and recall)- Higher beam_width = better recall but slower search
When host RAM is not large enough for mapping the entire database file, it is possible to build the database in several smaller pieces (random split). Then users can search the query againt each piece and collect results from each piece before merging (rank by distance). This is equivalent to a single big database approach (as long as K'>=K) but requires a much smaller number of RAM for memory-mapping. In practice, the Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB found that this database shard idea can improve recall. Intutively, with smaller data points for each piece, we can use large M and build beam width to further improve accuracy. See their paper here
# Build the library
cargo build --release
# Run tests
cargo test
# Run demo
cargo run --release --example demo
# Run performance test
cargo run --release --example perf_test
# test MNIST fashion dataset
wget http://ann-benchmarks.com/fashion-mnist-784-euclidean.hdf5
cargo run --release --example diskann_mnist
# test SIFT dataset
wget http://ann-benchmarks.com/sift-128-euclidean.hdf5
cargo run --release --example diskann_sift
See the examples/
directory for:
demo.rs
: Demo with 100k vectorsperf_test.rs
: Performance benchmarking with 1M vectorsdiskann_mnist.rs
: Performance benchmarking with MNIST fashion dataset (60K)diskann_sift.rs
: Performance benchmarking with SIFT 1M datasetbigann.rs
: Performance benchmarking with SIFT 10M datasethnsw_sift.rs
: Comparison with in-memory HNSW
Benchmark against in-memory HNSW (hnsw_rs crate)
### MNIST fashion, diskann, M4 Max
Building DiskANN index: n=60000, dim=784, max_degree=48, build_beam=256, alpha=1.2
Build complete. CPU time: 1726.199372s, wall time: 111.145414s
Searching 10000 queries with k=10, beam_width=384 β¦
mean fraction nb returned by search 1.0
last distances ratio 1.0031366
recall rate for "./fashion-mnist-784-euclidean.hdf5" is 0.98838 , nb req /s 18067.664
total cpu time for search requests 8.520862s , system time 553.475ms
### MNIST fashion, hnsw_rs, M4 Max
parallel insertion
hnsw data insertion cpu time 111.169283s system time Ok(7.256291s)
debug dump of PointIndexation
layer 0 : length : 59999
layer 1 : length : 1
debug dump of PointIndexation end
hnsw data nb point inserted 60000
searching with ef : 24
parallel search
total cpu time for search requests 3838.7310ms , system time 263.571ms
mean fraction nb returned by search 1.0
last distances ratio 1.0003573
recall rate for "./fashion-mnist-784-euclidean.hdf5" is 0.99054 , nb req /s 37940.44
MIT This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the LICENSE file for details.
Jayaram Subramanya, S., Devvrit, F., Simhadri, H.V., Krishnawamy, R. and Kadekodi, R., 2019. Diskann: Fast accurate billion-point nearest neighbor search on a single node. Advances in neural information processing Systems, 32.
This implementation is based on the DiskANN paper and the official Microsoft implementation. It was also largely inspired by the implementation here.