Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Downstream test: ignore Recast since its master is flaky #1931

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ariya
Copy link
Contributor

@ariya ariya commented May 19, 2018

Recast's TypeScript tests often fail spuriously, sometimes in conjuction with GraphQL,
so let's isolate us from it.

Recast's TypeScript tests often fail spuriously, sometimes in conjuction with GraphQL,
so let's isolate us from it.
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented May 19, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #1931 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #1931   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage     100%    100%           
======================================
  Files           1       1           
  Lines        4056    4056           
  Branches      717     717           
======================================
  Hits         4056    4056

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 39e7668...1706e6a. Read the comment docs.

@ariya ariya closed this in 30602bb May 21, 2018
ariya added a commit to ariya/esprima that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2018
Recast's TypeScript tests often fail spuriously, sometimes in conjuction with GraphQL,
so let's isolate us from it.

Closes jquerygh-1931
ariya added a commit to ariya/esprima that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2018
Recast's TypeScript tests often fail spuriously, sometimes in conjuction with GraphQL,
so let's isolate us from it.

Closes jquerygh-1931
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants