Update relative IRI definition #573
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ve to the document base, not the **vocabulary mapping**. Add additional explanatory text on relative IRIs to distinguish them from properties, values of `@type`, or values of properties defined to be vocabulary relative. Fixes #488.
|
👍 |
|
What does this mean? |
|
JSON-LD has always supported IRIs for identifying predicates. The issue is document-relative, vs vocabulary-relative IRIs, which we're going to consider further. So #488 remains open. |
|
Okay, I should be much clearer about the fact that my quest is for the use of "relative HTTP URIs" to identify the predicates of RDF statements when using JSON-LD notation :) Resolving this is very important. I would like to always provide both RDF-Turtle and JSON-LD examples when producing Semantic Web of Linked Data utility demos etc.. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
to clarify that it describes only IRIs relative to the document base, not the vocabulary mapping.
Add additional explanatory text on relative IRIs to distinguish them from properties, values of
@type, or values of properties defined to be vocabulary relative.Fixes #488.