Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automated cherry pick of #8452: Update coredns to 1.6.7 #8457

Conversation

gjtempleton
Copy link
Member

@gjtempleton gjtempleton commented Feb 1, 2020

Only worry about cherry-picking back this far is the lack of cherry-picking #7794 back this far which means we can't advise anyone potentially affected by the removal of the long deprecated DNS support (coredns/coredns#3554) to override the image as discussed at office hours today.

Cherry pick of #8452 on release-1.15.

#8452: Update coredns to 1.6.7

For details on the cherry pick process, see the cherry pick requests page.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.15 milestone Feb 1, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 1, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gjtempleton
To complete the pull request process, please assign kashifsaadat
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @kashifsaadat in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Feb 1, 2020

/lgtm
/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 1, 2020
@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Feb 1, 2020

/retest

2 similar comments
@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Feb 1, 2020

/retest

@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Feb 1, 2020

/retest

@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ spec:
beta.kubernetes.io/os: linux
containers:
- name: coredns
image: k8s.gcr.io/coredns:1.6.6
image: k8s.gcr.io/coredns:1.6.7
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The image for 1.6.7 isn't available in k8s.gcr.io...

It makes me wonder how #8452 and other cherry-pick PRs have passed tests.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the presubmit e2e tests still use kubedns since it is the kops default. Maybe this is a good time to bring attention to your #7919 :)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aah! that makes sense.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's the problem here to use coredns/coredns:1.6.7 instead?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe the kubernetes project moved from coredns/coredns to k8s.gcr.io/coredns so as to try to make sure that critical dependencies have a coherent "supply chain" - in particular the work going on in wg-k8s-infra. It's very much a work-in-progress though.

The good news: k8s.gcr.io/coredns:1.6.7 is now available :-)

Copy link
Member

@hakman hakman Feb 22, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@justinsb I think the CoreDNS 1.6.7 version was added under #8602.
I don't see it cherry-picked to 1.15 yet or any release note for it.

@gjtempleton shouldn't this be closed?

@gjtempleton
Copy link
Member Author

/hold given the image isn't available

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 6, 2020
@rifelpet
Copy link
Member

rifelpet commented Mar 2, 2020

now that kops 1.16.0 is released as stable, we probably wont be doing another 1.15 release. Do we think this is safe to close out?

@gjtempleton
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah, probably safe to close, I think it can be covered by a note in the changelog as a known issue at most.

@rifelpet rifelpet closed this Mar 3, 2020
@gjtempleton gjtempleton deleted the automated-cherry-pick-of-#8452-upstream-release-1.15 branch March 3, 2020 08:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants