common-instancetypes: Add remaining arm64 presubmits

[lyarwood]

What this PR does / why we need it:

This adds the remaining (for now) arm64 presubmits for common-instancetypes in support of kubevirt/common-instancetypes#170.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist

This checklist is not enforcing, but it's a reminder of items that could be relevant to every PR.
Approvers are expected to review this list.

• Design: A design document was considered and is present (link) or not required
• PR: The PR description is expressive enough and will help future contributors
• Code: Write code that humans can understand and Keep it simple
• Refactor: You have left the code cleaner than you found it (Boy Scout Rule)
• Upgrade: Impact of this change on upgrade flows was considered and addressed if required
• Testing: New code requires new unit tests. New features and bug fixes require at least on e2e test
• Documentation: A user-guide update was considered and is present (link) or not required. You want a user-guide update if it's a user facing feature / API change.
• Community: Announcement to kubevirt-dev was considered

Release note:

NONE

[0xFelix]

Suggested change

	- name: pull-common-instancetypes-kubevirt-functest-centos-stream-arm64
	- name: pull-common-instancetypes-kubevirt-functest-centos-stream-9-arm64

[lyarwood]

You likely missed this but CI was failing given the length of this name:

https://prow.ci.kubevirt.io/view/gs/kubevirt-prow/pr-logs/pull/kubevirt_project-infra/3519/check-prow-config/1811025451057942528

{"component":"checkconfig","file":"sigs.k8s.io/prow/cmd/checkconfig/main.go:91","func":"main.reportWarning","level":"warning","msg":"name of Presubmit job \"pull-common-instancetypes-kubevirt-functest-centos-stream-9-arm64\" (for repo \"kubevirt/common-instancetypes\") too long (should be at most 63 characters)","severity":"warning","time":"2024-07-10T13:11:40Z"}

[0xFelix]

/lgtm
/approve

[kubevirt-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 0xFelix

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• github/ci/prow-deploy/files/jobs/kubevirt/common-instancetypes/OWNERS [0xFelix]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[kubevirt-bot]

@lyarwood: Updated the job-config configmap in namespace kubevirt-prow at cluster default using the following files:

• key common-instancetypes-presubmits.yaml using file github/ci/prow-deploy/files/jobs/kubevirt/common-instancetypes/common-instancetypes-presubmits.yaml

In response to this:

What this PR does / why we need it:

This adds the remaining (for now) arm64 presubmits for common-instancetypes in support of kubevirt/common-instancetypes#170.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist

This checklist is not enforcing, but it's a reminder of items that could be relevant to every PR.
Approvers are expected to review this list.

• Design: A design document was considered and is present (link) or not required
• PR: The PR description is expressive enough and will help future contributors
• Code: Write code that humans can understand and Keep it simple
• Refactor: You have left the code cleaner than you found it (Boy Scout Rule)
• Upgrade: Impact of this change on upgrade flows was considered and addressed if required
• Testing: New code requires new unit tests. New features and bug fixes require at least on e2e test
• Documentation: A user-guide update was considered and is present (link) or not required. You want a user-guide update if it's a user facing feature / API change.
• Community: Announcement to kubevirt-dev was considered

Release note:

NONE

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.