Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tidy: remove trivial constructors #2511

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2023
Merged

tidy: remove trivial constructors #2511

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2023

Conversation

Riolku
Copy link
Collaborator

@Riolku Riolku commented Nov 28, 2023

Also removed trivial destructors. Also removed clangd.log, a temporary file that was accidentally committed in #2507.

Also removed trivial destructors. Also removed clangd.log, a temporary
file that was accidentally committed in #2507.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 28, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (2f64b63) 91.56% compared to head (bb9237a) 91.56%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2511   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.56%   91.56%           
=======================================
  Files        1026     1026           
  Lines       37947    37947           
=======================================
  Hits        34748    34748           
  Misses       3199     3199           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@

#include "common/timer.h"
#include "main/kuzu_fwd.h"
#include "transaction/transaction_context.h"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks like we are introducing a new include, which wasn't added previously, here?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes because we need access to the transaction context destructor in order to generate the destructor for clientcontext

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

got it. make sense

@Riolku Riolku merged commit d8c85a5 into master Nov 28, 2023
13 checks passed
@Riolku Riolku deleted the tidy-minor-fixes branch November 28, 2023 22:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants