You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 19, 2022. It is now read-only.
Using jrl_dynamics_urdf parser, the rank of each joint is defined by the browsing of the tree. It is browsed in a depth first way, and the priority of rank between childrens is determined by the alphabetical order.
To make it more concrete, the order of the dofs in the state vector for the Romeo robot is:
Free flyer
* Left leg
* Right leg
* Trunk
* * Left arm
* * Head
* * Right arm
As a result, depending on the name of the joints, their order in the state vector changes from one robot to another.
I think defining a generic order for the joint vector based on the REP 120 frames would make the reading easier (between robots), e.g.:
[FF, left-leg, right-leg, chest, head, left-arm, right-arm]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Francois,
Why don't you just access joints by name and stop relying on order which is
a bad idea anyway?
Le jeudi 9 janvier 2014, François Keith a écrit :
Using jrl_dynamics_urdf parser, the rank of each joint is defined by the
browsing of the tree. It is browsed in a depth first way, and the priority
of rank between childrens is determined by the alphabetical order.
To make it more concrete, the order of the dofs in the state vector for
the Romeo robot is:
Free flyer
Left leg
Right leg
Trunk
* Left arm
* Head
* Right arm
As a result, depending on the name of the joints, their order in the state
vector changes from one robot to another.
I think defining a generic order for the joint vector based on the REP 120
frames would make the reading easier (between robots), e.g.:
[FF, left-leg, right-leg, chest, head, left-arm, right-arm]
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/12
.
Using jrl_dynamics_urdf parser, the rank of each joint is defined by the browsing of the tree. It is browsed in a depth first way, and the priority of rank between childrens is determined by the alphabetical order.
To make it more concrete, the order of the dofs in the state vector for the Romeo robot is:
As a result, depending on the name of the joints, their order in the state vector changes from one robot to another.
I think defining a generic order for the joint vector based on the REP 120 frames would make the reading easier (between robots), e.g.:
[FF, left-leg, right-leg, chest, head, left-arm, right-arm]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: