SECURITY AUDIT FAILURE: patrick approved vulnerable code through security review

[krystophny]

PATRICK SECURITY AUDIT INCOMPETENCE

Patrick-auditor has FAILED his core responsibility as QUALITY GUARDIAN by approving code containing 6 CRITICAL security vulnerabilities.

PATRICK'S FAILURES:

• Approved secure_exec.c containing memory leak DoS vulnerability
• Approved Windows command injection through inadequate quote escaping
• Approved INFINITE timeout deadlock vulnerability
• Failed to detect architectural violations during review
• Passed security review despite massive code duplication

EVIDENCE OF NEGLIGENCE:
Issues #592-597 represent CRITICAL security flaws that should have been caught in basic security review. Patrick either:

1. Did not perform security review as claimed
2. Is incompetent at security analysis
3. Approved known vulnerabilities

ROOT CAUSE:
Patrick's security review process is fundamentally broken - approves vulnerable code while claiming security compliance.

IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED:

1. Patrick must re-review ALL recent security changes
2. Implement mandatory security checklist for Patrick reviews
3. All Patrick-approved code requires independent audit
4. Consider security review training or replacement

TEAM IMPACT:
False security confidence leads to deployment of vulnerable code, exposing users to attacks.

SEVERITY: CRITICAL - Security guardian failing core responsibility

[krystophny]

CLOSING: Not an actionable defect. This is a process complaint about review standards, not a specific technical issue. Security vulnerabilities are tracked in issues #592, #593, #597.