Skip to content

Conversation

TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator

@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

ldk-reviews-bot commented Sep 4, 2025

👋 I see @valentinewallace was un-assigned.
If you'd like another reviewer assignment, please click here.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 4, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.75%. Comparing base (0670550) to head (487a36d).
⚠️ Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4055      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.75%   88.75%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         176      176              
  Lines      129410   129410              
  Branches   129410   129410              
==========================================
- Hits       114864   114859       -5     
- Misses      11938    11947       +9     
+ Partials     2608     2604       -4     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzing 21.98% <ø> (ø)
tests 88.58% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

// At every point where we get a monitor update, we should be able to send a useful monitor
// to a watchtower and disk...
// to a watchtower and disk. At a minimum, this means we should be able to round-trip the
// monitor to a serialized copy and get he same one back.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's a small typo in this comment: "get he same one back" should be "get the same one back".

Suggested change
// monitor to a serialized copy and get he same one back.
// monitor to a serialized copy and get the same one back.

Spotted by Diamond

Fix in Graphite


Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt requested review from joostjager and removed request for valentinewallace September 4, 2025 19:33
Copy link
Contributor

@joostjager joostjager left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Helpful, especially for newer readers of the code.

@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@tnull tnull merged commit 04b9a17 into lightningdevkit:main Sep 5, 2025
25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants