-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 421
Correct and clarify comments in ChannelMonitor
loading test utils
#4055
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Correct and clarify comments in ChannelMonitor
loading test utils
#4055
Conversation
👋 I see @valentinewallace was un-assigned. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4055 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.75% 88.75% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 176 176
Lines 129410 129410
Branches 129410 129410
==========================================
- Hits 114864 114859 -5
- Misses 11938 11947 +9
+ Partials 2608 2604 -4
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
// At every point where we get a monitor update, we should be able to send a useful monitor | ||
// to a watchtower and disk... | ||
// to a watchtower and disk. At a minimum, this means we should be able to round-trip the | ||
// monitor to a serialized copy and get he same one back. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's a small typo in this comment: "get he same one back" should be "get the same one back".
// monitor to a serialized copy and get he same one back. | |
// monitor to a serialized copy and get the same one back. |
Spotted by Diamond
Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Helpful, especially for newer readers of the code.
👋 The first review has been submitted! Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer. |
From #3996 (review)