Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

travis - allow tickers to tick for coverage #1641

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

travis - allow tickers to tick for coverage #1641

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

offerm
Copy link
Contributor

@offerm offerm commented Jul 27, 2018

added a sleep of 16 seconds to one of the tests to make sure that the logTicker and the fwdEventicker have time to tick. Without this, these tickers may not tick during coverage test which may lead to a reduction of coverage.

See discussion in #1590

added a sleep of 16 seconds to one of the tests to make sure that the logTicker and the fwdEventicker have time to tick. Without this these ticker may not tick during coverage test which may lead to reduction of coverage.
@Roasbeef
Copy link
Member

Roasbeef commented Aug 9, 2018

Once #1668 is in, then we can ensure that all the tickers always tick, which will ensure that we aren't penalized coverage wise for this.

@halseth
Copy link
Contributor

halseth commented Aug 22, 2018

Ticker package is merged, can this PR be altered to force a tick instead of waiting for it to happen?

@halseth
Copy link
Contributor

halseth commented Sep 19, 2018

@offerm Did you try to force a tick?

@halseth halseth modified the milestones: 0.5.1, 0.5.2 Sep 19, 2018
@halseth
Copy link
Contributor

halseth commented Sep 26, 2018

Closing in favour of #1975.

@halseth halseth closed this Sep 26, 2018
cfromknecht added a commit to cfromknecht/lnd that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2018
Allows more reliable coverage results for
the htlcswitch package. Initially pointed
out by @offerm in lightningnetwork#1641.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants