lnwire: ensure even/odd features have the same base name #2570
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In this commit, we fix a bug in the way we defined our even/odd features for a particular feature. The check for if a feature bit is part of a pair assumes that the pair bit has the exact same name as the bit being queried. The way we defined our feature map didn't take note of this assumption, as a result, any attempts to require a new bit moving from optional to required would fail since the bit would be found, but the names differed.
|
I was getting the issue of seeing |
cfromknecht
approved these changes
Feb 1, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In this commit, we fix a bug in the way we defined our even/odd features
for a particular feature. The check for if a feature bit is part of a
pair assumes that the pair bit has the exact same name as the bit being
queried. The way we defined our feature map didn't take note of this
assumption, as a result, any attempts to require a new bit moving from
optional to required would fail since the bit would be found, but the
names differed.