You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
the project I work for is in the process of converting its documentation from sphinx to mkdocs.
We make use of the very convenient reference target specification and resolution of sphinx.
We have tried this plugin but it is not on par with sphinx's related powerful simplicity and features.
We are considering sponsoring mkdocstring to get access to relative and scoped cross-referencing features, but we wonder how it compares to sphinx features.
Would it be possible to have clarifications on these?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
the project I work for is in the process of converting its documentation from sphinx to mkdocs.
We make use of the very convenient reference target specification and resolution of sphinx.
We have tried this plugin but it is not on par with sphinx's related powerful simplicity and features.
We are considering sponsoring mkdocstring to get access to relative and scoped cross-referencing features, but we wonder how it compares to sphinx features.
Would it be possible to have clarifications on these?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions