New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revisiting negative positions through Add-On Gating #720
Comments
Thanks for filing a separate issue, I agree that's preferable. For now we plan to observe the WebMIDI experiment to see how well add-on-gating works in practice for sites and users. We haven't yet made any decisions about extending this mechanism to other APIs, but any such decisions will be informed by how well we think it's achieving its goals. |
Hi, are there any docs/help to using webmidi via this add-on gating? So far I'm seeing sites with webmidi support that aren't triggering the permission prompt and I wondered what the blocker for that could be, such as requiring user interaction first perhaps .e.g .: https://codesandbox.io/s/midi-pedal-mapper-bonfy I can see |
This is probably not the right place to discuss WebMIDI problems, but when opening your site in my browser I see the following error message in the web console:
|
I'm rather interested in this topic as well. I would really like to see the Web Bluetooth API available in Firefox. I had been working on converting an Extension that is already supported in Chrome to Firefox for Bluetooth dice rolls, but found that my journey was abruptly halted when I learned Firefox does not support the Web Bluetooth API at all. |
@bholley has any observations been made or documented in the past year? |
With Add-On Gating available in Firefox 108 and WebMIDI being the pioneer extension that's add-on gated:
Is there a (or: What is the) procedure to re-open negative positions as add-on gated? Is there a line established between "can be add-on gated" and "not even with gates" (other than that someone would need to do the implementation work)?
It might be convenient to gather that information (initially here, eventually in the README
) before people come in storming to their old threads and ask in each of them, without a concrete procedure or criteria. (I was very tempted to rush to #95, but it's probably better to approach that with structure).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: