Corresponding-source records for first-party Windows full CI build 37085543729

[asrulnasirudin]

Hello,

Where can I obtain the complete corresponding-source and dependency/build records for this first-party Windows CI full mpv package?

• CI run: https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/actions/runs/37085543729
• Job: mingw64-full (win64, gpl), ID 111094948460
• Artifact: mpv-v0.41.0-dev-g413ff0b1c-37085543729-x86_64-w64-mingw32-full.zip
• Artifact ID: 11261225371
• ZIP SHA-256: 3e492e47bfea0761924b7c6cc5509320fdb73a26f6c9e5590bac13dd6cd53997
• Extracted mpv.exe SHA-256: db36261c4ee2835a6e886f8ed154350228cba5c46622dab1a873c6e76b629b93
• mpv source: 413ff0b1cd4585294803308a1a14be2fad30cede
• Linked FFmpeg banner: git-2026-10-02-98e9256; libplacebo: v7.374.0

We are assessing redistribution with a Windows application and have retained the mpv source snapshot, GPL text and original CI log. We still need the matching statically linked dependency sources, applicable notices, local patches and relevant build material, rather than today's dependency checkouts.

The log records pulling ghcr.io/btbn/ffmpeg-builds/win64-gpl:latest with digest:

sha256:f13f8aecb6861fca2d428060be7553c05969d6195d0ddbc598623ecdbf274d2f

The public registry currently returns HTTP 404 / MANIFEST_UNKNOWN for that digest, while the current latest manifest is accessible. The recipe also makes shallow FFmpeg/LuaJIT/dependency checkouts; we do not assume current branch heads match the historical binary.

Is there an archived corresponding-source bundle, build-time dependency manifest/download cache, or a documented way to obtain the matching material for this exact artifact? If another maintainer owns the container records, a pointer would help.

Thank you.

[CounterPillow]

[kasper93]

All the information is there, like I said in another AI question, there is no summary currently. Patches welcome. Otherwise you can track things from logs and repo states like https://github.com/BtbN/FFmpeg-Builds. I won't do the work for you, sorry.

[CounterPillow]

more importantly, if they're shipping a product and don't know how to make their own builds, maybe they should not be shipping a product