Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stretched face on Android Chrome (jeelizFaceFilter) #25298

Closed
marcusx2 opened this issue Jan 17, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Stretched face on Android Chrome (jeelizFaceFilter) #25298

marcusx2 opened this issue Jan 17, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@marcusx2
Copy link

marcusx2 commented Jan 17, 2023

Description

If you try out this example on your Android Chrome, your face will be stretched vertically. I was going to report this on the jeeliz repository but the Get started specifically instructed to report bugs related to threejs here...The problem probably lies on this file.

The threejs library used.

Live example

https://jeeliz.com/demos/faceFilter/demos/threejs/gltf_fullScreen/

Version

112

Device

Mobile

Browser

Chrome

OS

Android

@Mugen87
Copy link
Collaborator

Mugen87 commented Jan 17, 2023

but the Get started specifically instructed to report bugs related to threejs here.

How is this related to three.js? Sorry but delegating issues like that isn't right. This needs to be investigated in the jeeliz repository. Only when an issue can be reproduces with a simple three.js live demo (https://jsfiddle.net/g3atw6k5/) without any dependencies it's okay to open an issue here.

@Mugen87 Mugen87 closed this as completed Jan 17, 2023
@marcusx2
Copy link
Author

marcusx2 commented Jan 17, 2023

@Mugen87 It's related to three.js because the jeelizFaceFilter library is platform agnostic, and the webcam feed is sent to a canvas controlled by threejs. I'm guessing the threejs examples were made by the threejs team? It's the only explanation I have why the Get started says that threejs stuff should be here and not in their repo. You can try creating an issue there and you will see the message. If I create the issue there the repo owner will probably just close my issue telling me to create the issue here...

@Mugen87
Copy link
Collaborator

Mugen87 commented Jan 17, 2023

Sorry but the jeeliz guidelines are highly questionable. We can't support third-party libraries like suggested. We simply don't have that kind of bandwidth. It's just fair to ask users to reproduce an issue with a simple, isolated code example.

@Mugen87
Copy link
Collaborator

Mugen87 commented Jan 17, 2023

I'm guessing the threejs examples were made by the threejs team?

BTW: No. AFAIK, nobody from the collaborators in involved in jeeliz.

@mrdoob
Copy link
Owner

mrdoob commented Jan 17, 2023

I'm sure @xavierjs will be happy to help. But please, do it so in the jeelizFaceFilter repo.

Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 17, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants