Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[#4355] OpenSslServerContext reinitializes the provided TrustManagerF… #4387

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

normanmaurer
Copy link
Member

…actory with the key cert chain.

Motivation:

OpenSslServerContext should not reinitialize the provided TrustManagerFactory with the key cert chain as the user should be able to pass a fully initialized TrustManagerFactory. This is also in line with how JdkSslServerContext works.

Modifications:

Not reinitialize the provided TrustManagerFactory with the key cert chain.

Result:

Correct and consistent behavior.

@normanmaurer normanmaurer self-assigned this Oct 23, 2015
@normanmaurer normanmaurer added this to the 4.0.33.Final milestone Oct 23, 2015
@normanmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

@Scottmitch @nmittler PTAL

@nmittler
Copy link
Member

LGTM

…actory with the key cert chain.

Motivation:

OpenSslServerContext should not reinitialize the provided TrustManagerFactory with the key cert chain as the user should be able to pass a fully initialized TrustManagerFactory. This is also in line with how JdkSslServerContext works.

Modifications:

Not reinitialize the provided TrustManagerFactory with the key cert chain.

Result:

Correct and consistent behavior.
@normanmaurer normanmaurer force-pushed the openssl_existing_trustmanagerfactory branch from a457c08 to 8495ca3 Compare October 24, 2015 09:05
@normanmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

Cherry-picked into 4.0 (1c72b34), 4.1(85236d5) and master (9f2b547)

@normanmaurer normanmaurer deleted the openssl_existing_trustmanagerfactory branch October 25, 2015 10:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants