Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

what do you think about bioconductor? #6

Closed
jovo opened this issue Sep 4, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

what do you think about bioconductor? #6

jovo opened this issue Sep 4, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@jovo
Copy link
Member

jovo commented Sep 4, 2016

it is somewhat related: https://www.bioconductor.org/
perhaps we should cite put our contribution in context of that.
what do you think?

@gkiar gkiar mentioned this issue Sep 12, 2016
5 tasks
@gkiar
Copy link
Collaborator

gkiar commented Sep 13, 2016

I think with the reframing of science in the cloud as a capability and proposed model for replication, but not yet a user facing service provided by us, the connection to bioconductor is weaker. If I understand correctly, it is a software package which amalgamates genomics computation tools into a single and consistent framework for R. That is super wonderful, but no longer parallel to what we're providing so I'm comfortable leaving out. Thoughts?

@jovo
Copy link
Member Author

jovo commented Sep 13, 2016

agreed, though we are low on citations, so i thought it might be good to
cite some other work,
including bioconductor, mybinder, science container stuff, etc.

when submitting a paper, you cite work that you think reviewers might be
pissed that you did not cite.
in other words, the choice of what to cite for a submission is based on
what can increase the changes of getting in.

also, the distinction is very clear to us, not as clear perhaps to other
people.
so, in the discussion, it might be worth explicitly differentiating between
our efforts and other ones.

all just ideas...

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Greg Kiar notifications@github.com wrote:

I think with the reframing of science in the cloud as a capability and
proposed model for replication, but not yet a user facing service provided
by us, the connection to bioconductor is weaker. If I understand correctly,
it is a software package which amalgamates genomics computation tools into
a single and consistent framework for R. That is super wonderful, but no
longer parallel to what we're providing so I'm comfortable leaving out.
Thoughts?


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#6 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACjct6OYHJwfvj7rc44Zcrd058Rr-Q8ks5qpvuFgaJpZM4J0oBe
.

the glass is all full: half water, half air.
neurodata.io, jovo calendar
https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=joshuav%40gmail.com&ctz=America/New_York

@gkiar
Copy link
Collaborator

gkiar commented Sep 14, 2016

Great point. I'm still learning this stuff! :)

I also added citations for the known scientific container manuscripts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants