Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add demultiplexing subworkflow 10x #202

Merged

Conversation

nschcolnicov
Copy link
Contributor

@nschcolnicov nschcolnicov commented Jul 16, 2024

This ticket addresses this issue:
nf-core/modules#5984

PR checklist

  • This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
  • If you've added a new tool - have you followed the pipeline conventions in the contribution docs
  • If necessary, also make a PR on the nf-core/demultiplex branch on the nf-core/test-datasets repository.
  • Make sure your code lints (nf-core lint).
  • Ensure the test suite passes (nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Check for unexpected warnings in debug mode (nextflow run . -profile debug,test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Usage Documentation in docs/usage.md is updated.
  • Output Documentation in docs/output.md is updated.
  • CHANGELOG.md is updated.
  • README.md is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).

@nschcolnicov nschcolnicov requested a review from a team as a code owner July 16, 2024 21:53
@nschcolnicov nschcolnicov requested review from glichtenstein and removed request for a team July 16, 2024 21:53
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 16, 2024

nf-core lint overall result: Passed ✅ ⚠️

Posted for pipeline commit a747c66

+| ✅ 183 tests passed       |+
#| ❔   3 tests were ignored |#
!| ❗   6 tests had warnings |!

❗ Test warnings:

  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in README.md: Describe the minimum required steps to execute the pipeline, e.g. how to prepare samplesheets.
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in methods_description_template.yml: #Update the HTML below to your preferred methods description, e.g. add publication citation for this pipeline
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Optionally add in-text citation tools to this list.
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Optionally add bibliographic entries to this list.
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Only uncomment below if logic in toolCitationText/toolBibliographyText has been filled!
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in awsfulltest.yml: You can customise AWS full pipeline tests as required

❔ Tests ignored:

✅ Tests passed:

Run details

  • nf-core/tools version 2.14.1
  • Run at 2024-07-25 12:24:16

@atrigila
Copy link
Contributor

Can you run pre-commit run --all-files and commit the suggested changes? That will fix the linting issues.

Copy link
Contributor

@atrigila atrigila left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good job, left some comments. It would be nice to add the mkfastq test (and others) to GitHub CI tests to have automatic checks when pushing changes, if the file size allows.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
conf/test_mkfastq.config Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/output.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/output.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/output.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
modules/nf-core/cellranger/mkfastq/main.nf Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
subworkflows/local/mkfastq_demultiplex/main.nf Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
subworkflows/local/mkfastq_demultiplex/main.nf Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@nschcolnicov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nf-core-bot fix linting pretty please

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This snapshot seems to be missing the snaps of the filepaths.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice catch, weird, Ill look into it.

@@ -230,7 +238,7 @@ workflow DEMULTIPLEX {
)
)

MULTIQC (
MULTIQC ( //TODO fix multiqc not resuming

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably the summary maps used to collect run information might have some float variable like run name, star time, or something like this.

Would recommend first looking at the "ch_workflow_summary"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good, I will address this on a separate ticket to keep things clean.

@nschcolnicov nschcolnicov force-pushed the add_demultiplexing_subworkflow_10x branch 3 times, most recently from 20c0676 to b76b664 Compare July 23, 2024 21:57
@nschcolnicov nschcolnicov force-pushed the add_demultiplexing_subworkflow_10x branch from 3b4913e to b76b664 Compare July 23, 2024 23:48
@nschcolnicov
Copy link
Contributor Author

The issue with the mkfastq CI test, seems to be unrelated to the scope of this ticket. I will remove it from the PR and address it in a separate ticket: #211

@nschcolnicov nschcolnicov merged commit cccaae2 into nf-core:dev Jul 25, 2024
9 checks passed
@apeltzer apeltzer mentioned this pull request Aug 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants