-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add demultiplexing subworkflow 10x #202
Add demultiplexing subworkflow 10x #202
Conversation
…, initialized empty test_mkfastq profile file
|
Can you run |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good job, left some comments. It would be nice to add the mkfastq
test (and others) to GitHub CI tests to have automatic checks when pushing changes, if the file size allows.
@nf-core-bot fix linting pretty please |
…om/nschcolnicov/demultiplex into add_demultiplexing_subworkflow_10x
tests/pipeline/mkfastq.nf.test.snap
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This snapshot seems to be missing the snaps of the filepaths.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice catch, weird, Ill look into it.
@@ -230,7 +238,7 @@ workflow DEMULTIPLEX { | |||
) | |||
) | |||
|
|||
MULTIQC ( | |||
MULTIQC ( //TODO fix multiqc not resuming |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably the summary maps used to collect run information might have some float variable like run name, star time, or something like this.
Would recommend first looking at the "ch_workflow_summary"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good, I will address this on a separate ticket to keep things clean.
20c0676
to
b76b664
Compare
3b4913e
to
b76b664
Compare
The issue with the mkfastq CI test, seems to be unrelated to the scope of this ticket. I will remove it from the PR and address it in a separate ticket: #211 |
…_demultiplexing_subworkflow_10x
This ticket addresses this issue:
nf-core/modules#5984
PR checklist
nf-core lint
).nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>
).nextflow run . -profile debug,test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>
).docs/usage.md
is updated.docs/output.md
is updated.CHANGELOG.md
is updated.README.md
is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).