Skip to content

Conversation

swederik
Copy link
Member

Addresses #559 and #420

@swederik
Copy link
Member Author

Should I put the same line within the MRtrix-related workflows?

@chrisgorgo
Copy link
Member

I guess so - this is for smooth FSL-MRTrix interaction? For reusable workflows it might be better to set the output type on each node individually.

chrisgorgo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2013
BF - Added FSL output type NIFTI to dmri mrtrix example
@chrisgorgo chrisgorgo merged commit 295116e into nipy:master Jul 3, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants