|
| 1 | +package org.nkcoder.concurrency.atomic; |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService; |
| 4 | +import java.util.concurrent.Executors; |
| 5 | +import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit; |
| 6 | +import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger; |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +/** |
| 9 | + * AtomicInteger: Lock-free thread-safe integer operations. |
| 10 | + * |
| 11 | + * <p>Key concepts: |
| 12 | + * <ul> |
| 13 | + * <li>Uses CAS (Compare-And-Swap) hardware instructions</li> |
| 14 | + * <li>No locks, no blocking - better performance under contention</li> |
| 15 | + * <li>Individual operations are atomic, not compound operations</li> |
| 16 | + * <li>Great for counters, sequence generators, statistics</li> |
| 17 | + * </ul> |
| 18 | + * |
| 19 | + * <p>Interview tip: Understand CAS and why incrementAndGet is atomic but |
| 20 | + * get() followed by set() is not. |
| 21 | + */ |
| 22 | +public class AtomicIntegerExample { |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | + public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { |
| 25 | + whyAtomicNeeded(); |
| 26 | + basicOperations(); |
| 27 | + atomicIncrementDecrement(); |
| 28 | + compareAndSet(); |
| 29 | + accumulateAndUpdate(); |
| 30 | + atomicVsSynchronized(); |
| 31 | + bestPractices(); |
| 32 | + } |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | + static void whyAtomicNeeded() throws Exception { |
| 35 | + System.out.println("=== Why Atomic Operations Are Needed ==="); |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | + // Non-atomic increment (BROKEN) |
| 38 | + class BrokenCounter { |
| 39 | + private int count = 0; |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | + void increment() { |
| 42 | + count++; // NOT atomic! Read-modify-write |
| 43 | + } |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | + int get() { return count; } |
| 46 | + } |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | + // Atomic increment (CORRECT) |
| 49 | + class SafeCounter { |
| 50 | + private final AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger(0); |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | + void increment() { |
| 53 | + count.incrementAndGet(); // Atomic operation |
| 54 | + } |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | + int get() { return count.get(); } |
| 57 | + } |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | + int iterations = 10_000; |
| 60 | + int threads = 10; |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | + // Test broken counter |
| 63 | + BrokenCounter broken = new BrokenCounter(); |
| 64 | + try (ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(threads)) { |
| 65 | + for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++) { |
| 66 | + executor.submit(broken::increment); |
| 67 | + } |
| 68 | + } |
| 69 | + System.out.println(" Broken counter: " + broken.get() + " (expected " + iterations + ")"); |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | + // Test safe counter |
| 72 | + SafeCounter safe = new SafeCounter(); |
| 73 | + try (ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(threads)) { |
| 74 | + for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++) { |
| 75 | + executor.submit(safe::increment); |
| 76 | + } |
| 77 | + } |
| 78 | + System.out.println(" Atomic counter: " + safe.get() + " (expected " + iterations + ")"); |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | + System.out.println(""" |
| 81 | +
|
| 82 | + Why count++ is not atomic: |
| 83 | + 1. Read current value from memory |
| 84 | + 2. Add 1 to the value |
| 85 | + 3. Write new value back to memory |
| 86 | +
|
| 87 | + Two threads can read the same value, both add 1, |
| 88 | + and both write back - losing one increment! |
| 89 | + """); |
| 90 | + } |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | + static void basicOperations() { |
| 93 | + System.out.println("=== Basic Operations ==="); |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | + AtomicInteger atomic = new AtomicInteger(10); |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | + // get() - read current value |
| 98 | + System.out.println(" get(): " + atomic.get()); |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | + // set() - write new value |
| 101 | + atomic.set(20); |
| 102 | + System.out.println(" set(20): " + atomic.get()); |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | + // getAndSet() - atomically set and return old value |
| 105 | + int old = atomic.getAndSet(30); |
| 106 | + System.out.println(" getAndSet(30): old=" + old + ", new=" + atomic.get()); |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | + // lazySet() - eventual write (no memory barrier, faster) |
| 109 | + atomic.lazySet(40); |
| 110 | + System.out.println(" lazySet(40): " + atomic.get()); |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | + System.out.println(); |
| 113 | + } |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | + static void atomicIncrementDecrement() { |
| 116 | + System.out.println("=== Atomic Increment/Decrement ==="); |
| 117 | + |
| 118 | + AtomicInteger counter = new AtomicInteger(0); |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | + // incrementAndGet() - add 1, return NEW value |
| 121 | + System.out.println(" incrementAndGet(): " + counter.incrementAndGet()); // 1 |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | + // getAndIncrement() - return OLD value, then add 1 |
| 124 | + System.out.println(" getAndIncrement(): " + counter.getAndIncrement()); // 1 (now 2) |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | + // decrementAndGet() - subtract 1, return NEW value |
| 127 | + System.out.println(" decrementAndGet(): " + counter.decrementAndGet()); // 1 |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | + // getAndDecrement() - return OLD value, then subtract 1 |
| 130 | + System.out.println(" getAndDecrement(): " + counter.getAndDecrement()); // 1 (now 0) |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | + // addAndGet() - add N, return NEW value |
| 133 | + System.out.println(" addAndGet(5): " + counter.addAndGet(5)); // 5 |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | + // getAndAdd() - return OLD value, then add N |
| 136 | + System.out.println(" getAndAdd(3): " + counter.getAndAdd(3)); // 5 (now 8) |
| 137 | + |
| 138 | + System.out.println(" Final value: " + counter.get()); // 8 |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | + System.out.println(""" |
| 141 | +
|
| 142 | + Pattern: |
| 143 | + - getAndXxx(): Returns OLD value, then applies operation |
| 144 | + - xxxAndGet(): Applies operation, then returns NEW value |
| 145 | +
|
| 146 | + All operations are atomic (single CAS instruction). |
| 147 | + """); |
| 148 | + } |
| 149 | + |
| 150 | + static void compareAndSet() { |
| 151 | + System.out.println("=== Compare-And-Set (CAS) ==="); |
| 152 | + |
| 153 | + AtomicInteger atomic = new AtomicInteger(10); |
| 154 | + |
| 155 | + // compareAndSet(expected, update) |
| 156 | + // Only updates if current value equals expected |
| 157 | + boolean success1 = atomic.compareAndSet(10, 20); // expect 10, set to 20 |
| 158 | + System.out.println(" CAS(10, 20): " + success1 + ", value=" + atomic.get()); |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | + boolean success2 = atomic.compareAndSet(10, 30); // expect 10, but it's 20 now |
| 161 | + System.out.println(" CAS(10, 30): " + success2 + ", value=" + atomic.get()); |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | + // CAS loop pattern - retry until success |
| 164 | + System.out.println("\n CAS loop pattern (multiply by 2):"); |
| 165 | + int oldValue, newValue; |
| 166 | + do { |
| 167 | + oldValue = atomic.get(); |
| 168 | + newValue = oldValue * 2; |
| 169 | + } while (!atomic.compareAndSet(oldValue, newValue)); |
| 170 | + System.out.println(" Result: " + atomic.get()); |
| 171 | + |
| 172 | + System.out.println(""" |
| 173 | +
|
| 174 | + CAS is the foundation of lock-free algorithms: |
| 175 | + 1. Read current value |
| 176 | + 2. Compute new value |
| 177 | + 3. CAS: if still same, update; else retry |
| 178 | +
|
| 179 | + This is what incrementAndGet() does internally! |
| 180 | + """); |
| 181 | + } |
| 182 | + |
| 183 | + static void accumulateAndUpdate() { |
| 184 | + System.out.println("=== Accumulate and Update ==="); |
| 185 | + |
| 186 | + AtomicInteger atomic = new AtomicInteger(10); |
| 187 | + |
| 188 | + // updateAndGet(function) - apply function atomically |
| 189 | + int result1 = atomic.updateAndGet(x -> x * 2); |
| 190 | + System.out.println(" updateAndGet(x -> x * 2): " + result1); // 20 |
| 191 | + |
| 192 | + // getAndUpdate(function) - return old, then apply |
| 193 | + int result2 = atomic.getAndUpdate(x -> x + 5); |
| 194 | + System.out.println(" getAndUpdate(x -> x + 5): old=" + result2 + ", new=" + atomic.get()); |
| 195 | + |
| 196 | + // accumulateAndGet(value, function) - combine with another value |
| 197 | + int result3 = atomic.accumulateAndGet(3, (current, x) -> current * x); |
| 198 | + System.out.println(" accumulateAndGet(3, (c,x) -> c*x): " + result3); // 25 * 3 = 75 |
| 199 | + |
| 200 | + // getAndAccumulate(value, function) |
| 201 | + int result4 = atomic.getAndAccumulate(2, Integer::sum); |
| 202 | + System.out.println(" getAndAccumulate(2, Integer::sum): old=" + result4); // 75 (now 77) |
| 203 | + |
| 204 | + System.out.println(" Final value: " + atomic.get()); |
| 205 | + |
| 206 | + System.out.println(""" |
| 207 | +
|
| 208 | + These methods handle the CAS loop internally: |
| 209 | + - updateAndGet(): f(current) -> new |
| 210 | + - accumulateAndGet(): f(current, given) -> new |
| 211 | +
|
| 212 | + Cleaner than writing your own CAS loop! |
| 213 | + """); |
| 214 | + } |
| 215 | + |
| 216 | + static void atomicVsSynchronized() throws Exception { |
| 217 | + System.out.println("=== Atomic vs Synchronized ==="); |
| 218 | + |
| 219 | + int operations = 1_000_000; |
| 220 | + |
| 221 | + // Synchronized counter |
| 222 | + class SyncCounter { |
| 223 | + private int count = 0; |
| 224 | + synchronized void increment() { count++; } |
| 225 | + synchronized int get() { return count; } |
| 226 | + } |
| 227 | + |
| 228 | + // Atomic counter |
| 229 | + AtomicInteger atomicCounter = new AtomicInteger(0); |
| 230 | + |
| 231 | + // Benchmark synchronized |
| 232 | + SyncCounter sync = new SyncCounter(); |
| 233 | + long start1 = System.nanoTime(); |
| 234 | + try (ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(4)) { |
| 235 | + for (int i = 0; i < operations; i++) { |
| 236 | + executor.submit(sync::increment); |
| 237 | + } |
| 238 | + } |
| 239 | + long syncTime = TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS.toMillis(System.nanoTime() - start1); |
| 240 | + |
| 241 | + // Benchmark atomic |
| 242 | + long start2 = System.nanoTime(); |
| 243 | + try (ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(4)) { |
| 244 | + for (int i = 0; i < operations; i++) { |
| 245 | + executor.submit(atomicCounter::incrementAndGet); |
| 246 | + } |
| 247 | + } |
| 248 | + long atomicTime = TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS.toMillis(System.nanoTime() - start2); |
| 249 | + |
| 250 | + System.out.println(" Synchronized: " + syncTime + "ms, count=" + sync.get()); |
| 251 | + System.out.println(" Atomic: " + atomicTime + "ms, count=" + atomicCounter.get()); |
| 252 | + |
| 253 | + System.out.println(""" |
| 254 | +
|
| 255 | + +-------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ |
| 256 | + | Feature | synchronized | AtomicInteger | |
| 257 | + +-------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ |
| 258 | + | Mechanism | Lock (monitor) | CAS (hardware) | |
| 259 | + | Blocking | Yes | No (spins/retries) | |
| 260 | + | Compound ops | Yes (any code block) | Limited (single op) | |
| 261 | + | Contention | Slower (waiting) | Faster (retrying) | |
| 262 | + | Memory visibility | Full barrier | Volatile semantics | |
| 263 | + +-------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ |
| 264 | +
|
| 265 | + Use Atomic when: |
| 266 | + - Single variable updates |
| 267 | + - Simple increment/compare operations |
| 268 | + - High contention expected |
| 269 | +
|
| 270 | + Use synchronized when: |
| 271 | + - Multiple variables must update together |
| 272 | + - Complex logic in critical section |
| 273 | + - Need to wait on conditions |
| 274 | + """); |
| 275 | + } |
| 276 | + |
| 277 | + static void bestPractices() { |
| 278 | + System.out.println("=== Best Practices ==="); |
| 279 | + |
| 280 | + System.out.println(""" |
| 281 | + DO: |
| 282 | + - Use AtomicInteger for counters, sequence numbers |
| 283 | + - Use updateAndGet/accumulateAndGet for custom operations |
| 284 | + - Prefer atomic classes for single-variable thread safety |
| 285 | +
|
| 286 | + DON'T: |
| 287 | + - Use for compound operations (check-then-act) |
| 288 | + - Assume multiple atomic ops are atomic together: |
| 289 | +
|
| 290 | + // BROKEN - not atomic as a whole! |
| 291 | + if (counter.get() == 0) { |
| 292 | + counter.set(1); |
| 293 | + } |
| 294 | +
|
| 295 | + // CORRECT - single atomic operation |
| 296 | + counter.compareAndSet(0, 1); |
| 297 | +
|
| 298 | + Related classes: |
| 299 | + - AtomicLong, AtomicBoolean - other primitives |
| 300 | + - AtomicReference<T> - for objects |
| 301 | + - AtomicIntegerArray - atomic array operations |
| 302 | + - LongAdder/LongAccumulator - better for high contention |
| 303 | +
|
| 304 | + Performance tip: |
| 305 | + For very high contention counters, LongAdder is faster |
| 306 | + than AtomicLong because it reduces contention by spreading |
| 307 | + updates across multiple cells. |
| 308 | + """); |
| 309 | + } |
| 310 | +} |
0 commit comments