Skip to content

Conversation

Hilzu
Copy link
Contributor

@Hilzu Hilzu commented Sep 18, 2025

As discussed in #49148 (comment) the feature should be ready to be marked stable.

The change could probably be picked to v24 and be featured in the change log.

This is my first time contributing to node so let me know if there's any mistakes.

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. label Sep 18, 2025
As discussed in the referenced issue the feature should be ready to be
marked as stable.

Refs: nodejs#49148 (comment)
@Hilzu Hilzu force-pushed the stabilize-env-file branch from 7828c03 to 265f3b2 Compare September 18, 2025 13:59
@aduh95 aduh95 added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Sep 23, 2025
@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

aduh95 commented Sep 23, 2025

Would it make sense to mark as stable process.loadEnvFile and util.parseEnv as well?

@Hilzu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hilzu commented Sep 24, 2025

To me it makes sense at least. I'll create a commit marking those as stable as well. The people that know the env system better can comment if it should be included or not.

@anonrig anonrig added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 24, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added request-ci-failed An error occurred while starting CI via request-ci label, and manual interventon is needed. and removed request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels Sep 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Failed to start CI
   ⚠  Commits were pushed since the last approving review:
   ⚠  - doc: mark --env-file and --env-file-if-exists as stable
   ⚠  - doc: use correct terminology for newly stable feature
   ⚠  - doc: mark `process.loadEnvFile` and `util.parseEnv` as stable
   ✘  Refusing to run CI on potentially unsafe PR
https://github.com/nodejs/node/actions/runs/17975693366

@anonrig anonrig added request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. and removed request-ci-failed An error occurred while starting CI via request-ci label, and manual interventon is needed. labels Sep 24, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 24, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

aduh95 commented Sep 24, 2025

@anonrig doc-only PRs do not need a Jenkins CI run FYI

@Hilzu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hilzu commented Oct 3, 2025

The failed CI run is most likely flaky and shouldn't be relevant for this PR as it is just a documentation update. Is there anything else I need to do or is this just waiting to land?

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@aduh95 aduh95 merged commit bb04959 into nodejs:main Oct 3, 2025
51 of 54 checks passed
@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

aduh95 commented Oct 3, 2025

Landed in bb04959

targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2025
As discussed in the referenced issue the feature should be ready to be
marked as stable.

Refs: #49148 (comment)
PR-URL: #59925
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants