-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.4k
doc: mark --env-file and --env-file-if-exists as stable #59925
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
As discussed in the referenced issue the feature should be ready to be marked as stable. Refs: nodejs#49148 (comment)
7828c03
to
265f3b2
Compare
Would it make sense to mark as stable |
To me it makes sense at least. I'll create a commit marking those as stable as well. The people that know the env system better can comment if it should be included or not. |
Failed to start CI⚠ Commits were pushed since the last approving review: ⚠ - doc: mark --env-file and --env-file-if-exists as stable ⚠ - doc: use correct terminology for newly stable feature ⚠ - doc: mark `process.loadEnvFile` and `util.parseEnv` as stable ✘ Refusing to run CI on potentially unsafe PRhttps://github.com/nodejs/node/actions/runs/17975693366 |
@anonrig doc-only PRs do not need a Jenkins CI run FYI |
The failed CI run is most likely flaky and shouldn't be relevant for this PR as it is just a documentation update. Is there anything else I need to do or is this just waiting to land? |
Landed in bb04959 |
As discussed in the referenced issue the feature should be ready to be marked as stable. Refs: #49148 (comment) PR-URL: #59925 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
As discussed in #49148 (comment) the feature should be ready to be marked stable.
The change could probably be picked to v24 and be featured in the change log.
This is my first time contributing to node so let me know if there's any mistakes.