DOC: should `numpy.i` be included as part of SWIG?

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

Issue with current documentation:

Is this still on the agenda?

numpy/numpy/doc/swig/README

Lines 6 to 8 in 6a23ed3

	and C++ code that uses C arrays and the python module NumPy. It is
	ultimately hoped that numpy.i will be included as part of the SWIG
	distribution.

From swig/swig#361:

SWIG provides library code for C and C++ standard library components. I don't ever envisage it providing wrappers for 3rd party libraries like numpy as it is up to those 3rd party libraries to maintain the SWIG wrappers and @ojwb gives some good reasons why.

Idea or request for content:

Either ask SWIG to accept numpy.i for inclusion, or remove that sentence.

[ojwb]

@DimitriPapadopoulos Please be mindful that if you quote text containing an @ mention then the person mentioned gets a notification from github and subscribed to the ticket - in this case I woke up to three useless extra notifications and two extra useless subscriptions.

The upstream ticket linked to gives SWIG point of view on this, and clearly no further input from me is needed since it's resolved already. Having to visit tickets to see why I was mentioned and then unsubscribe myself because it's not relevant just eats into the limited time I have to work on SWIG.