-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 366
Add changelog for ppxlib 0.30.0 #1321
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you think the following would be too long? Btw, I haven't put much thought into the wording, feel free to rephrase it.
|
|
||
| We're pleased to announce the release of Ppxlib 0.30.0. | ||
|
|
||
| This release comes with support for OCaml 5.1 and brings several improvements and bug fixes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| This release comes with support for OCaml 5.1 and brings several improvements and bug fixes. | |
| This release comes with support for OCaml 5.1 and brings several improvements and bug fixes. | |
| On the side of writing PPXs, the user experience of `Ast_pattern` and `metaquot` have been | |
| improved by adding more utility functions to the former and improving the error reporting of | |
| the latter. On the side of using PPXs, the experience of compatibility with OCaml `trunk` | |
| has been improved: the Driver gets biased into recognizing the accurate Parsetree version on | |
| non-unique Parsetree magic numbers, allowing for general compatibility with both `trunk` and | |
| stable OCaml versions at the same time. Furthermore, the release makes Ppxlib compatible | |
| with ReScript by adding "ns" and "res" as reserved namespaces. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's perfect, I'll use this and rephrase it if needed, thanks!
Co-authored-by: Sonja Heinze <sonjaleaheinze@gmail.com>
1818fe7 to
ea798ec
Compare
|
Ready to go when Ppxlib lands on opam-repository (ocaml/opam-repository#23965). @christinerose don't hesitate to have a look as well if you want |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I asked a few questions about formatting certain words for the purpose of clarity.
|
Thanks @christinerose! With your review, I've noticed how sloppy we are with formatting/readability of changelog entries. I'll try to pay more attention to it. |
No worries! It's my job to ensure things are consistent and clear, so I'm more than happy to do it!! In fact, being the English geek I am, I really enjoy it. 😊 |
Co-authored-by: Christine Rose <christinerose@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sonja Heinze <sonjaleaheinze@gmail.com>
@pitag-ha what would you like to see highlighted in the announcement apart from the compat with 5.1?