-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 261
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
codeQL checks are failing #7499
Comments
planetf1
changed the title
codeQL checks are failing unreliably
codeQL checks are failing
Mar 7, 2023
Action that can filter out analysis data by pathname from sarif files |
Additional options
Either/both may still hit size limits on the sarif file due to code volume ... |
planetf1
added a commit
to planetf1/egeria
that referenced
this issue
Mar 9, 2023
Signed-off-by: Nigel Jones <nigel.l.jones+git@gmail.com>
planetf1
added a commit
to planetf1/egeria
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2023
Update codeQL configuration to limit RAM use odpi#7499
planetf1
added a commit
to planetf1/egeria
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2023
Signed-off-by: Nigel Jones <nigel.l.jones+git@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
We have made multiple issues with codeQL scans failing in unknown ways
Our codebase is large..
CodeQL works by
Options include
It's worth noting that sonatype also has issues with our code base - many tools are currently failing due to gradle hitting an out of memory error when analysing dependencies of our 300+ components (IntelliJ can also struggle with its tooling). This may indicate our repo is too large and complex and we need to consider refactoring
For now the codeQL check is not mandatory and will likely fail
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: